Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:62237 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 76900 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2012 12:21:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Aug 2012 12:21:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:48480] helo=xdebug.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 72/E5-31572-3D88F205 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 08:21:40 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C697DE13D; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:21:37 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:21:37 +0100 (BST) X-X-Sender: derick@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl To: Nikita Popov cc: PHP internals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Generators From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Sat, 11 Aug 2012, Nikita Popov wrote: > Hi internals! > > I think there already was a lot of discussion on the generators, so > it's time to move to the next step. I'd like to vote on the feature in > two weeks, so this the "announce[ment] on internals@, by the author, > with the intention of voting on it". > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/generators > > If you have any further feedback, now would be a good time to raise > it. If there is something you previously posted, but which I didn't > yet address, please let me know. There were around 150 mails and I > sure missed some of them. I've some comments how that I've read the RFC: > Recognition of generator functions > > 1. Any function which contains a yield statement is automatically a > generator function. > > 2. The initial implementation required that generator functions are > marked with an asterix modifier (function*). This method has the > advantage that generators are more explicit and also allows for > yield-less coroutines. > > The automatic detection was chosen over the asterix modifier for the > following reasons: I am against this. This is even more magic in PHP. Is it really that difficult to have to mark the function with a different keyword, such as "generator": > generator function getLinesFromFile($fileName) { > if (!$fileHandle = fopen($fileName, 'r')) { > return; > } > There is an existing generator implementation in HipHop PHP, which > uses automatic-detection. Using the asterix modifier would break > compatibility. This should not be a concern, sure, it's annoying for the hiphop developers but they chose to copy and then *chance* the PHP language for their own effect. > yield: Yields the value null with an auto-incrementing integer key. What is the usecase for this? cheers, Derick -- http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: http://xdebug.org/donate.php twitter: @derickr and @xdebug