Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:61963 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 8347 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2012 12:49:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Aug 2012 12:49:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 213.123.26.187 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 213.123.26.187 c2beaomr09.btconnect.com Received: from [213.123.26.187] ([213.123.26.187:57856] helo=mail.btconnect.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E5/A3-21438-3677A105 for ; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 08:49:40 -0400 Received: from host81-138-11-136.in-addr.btopenworld.com (EHLO _10.0.0.5_) ([81.138.11.136]) by c2beaomr09.btconnect.com with ESMTP id IMH01252; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:49:36 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <501A775C.2040202@lsces.co.uk> Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:49:32 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120604 Firefox/13.0 SeaMonkey/2.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP internals References: <501A69B4.4040401@lsces.co.uk> <501A73B8.3030009@richgray.com> In-Reply-To: <501A73B8.3030009@richgray.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=Fair-1, source=Queried, refid=tid=0001.0A0B0302.501A775D.00E1, actions=tag X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=7/50, refid=2.7.2:2012.8.2.121222:17:7.944, ip=81.138.11.136, rules=__MOZILLA_MSGID, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, __HAS_FROM, __USER_AGENT, __MIME_VERSION, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __ANY_URI, __URI_NO_MAILTO, __URI_NO_WWW, __CP_URI_IN_BODY, __INT_PROD_COMP, BODY_ENDS_IN_URL, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_2000_2999, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED, HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC, RDNS_SUSP, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2beaomr09.btconnect.com X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0B0206.501A7760.01BE:SCFSTAT14830815,ss=1,re=-4.000,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2011-07-25 19:15:43, dmn=2011-05-27 18:58:46, mode=multiengine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] register_globals work arounds From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) rich gray wrote: >> OK >> >> No discussions on why register_globals has been removed we all understand why >> and now have to live with that ... I'm not winging here! >> >> The question is "Does anybody have an 'elegant' fix to quickly update a legacy >> site that relies on globals to pass variables between page views?" >> My original quick thought was simply to remap these variables as >> $_SESSION['var'] so as not to get too deeply into the code base. I've used >> that in a few quick fixes, but I'm not sure that it is acceptable? I have been >> passing the variables via $_REQUEST but that obviously needs a lot more work >> in the html generated, so the session approach would seem better? But needs to >> observe the European rules on use of cookies :( >> >> I'm thinking that what is needed is a sort of PEAR package that would simply >> be added to every page and be provided with a list of variables to manage, so >> all we need to do is scan the site for variables and establish which need to >> be remembered. I've got all sorts of stuff from google/bing searches, but I'm >> obviously not yet asking the right question ;) Has anybody already been down >> that track? >> > IMO - this should be posted on PHP general not internals -- have you tried > extract() ? > http://fr2.php.net/extract I'm specifically asking in relation to helping users migrate from PHP5.2 ... trying to expand the documentation of making that process easier. Pointing at a single manual page is a good example of why we need a more consistent support for all those users who are not as computer literate as we would like. That function may be a useful element of solving the problem, but it does not answer the specific question asked? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk