Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:61957 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 85241 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2012 09:47:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Aug 2012 09:47:12 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=hanskrentel@yahoo.de; sender-id=unknown; domainkeys=good Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=hanskrentel@yahoo.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain yahoo.de from 77.238.189.214 cause and error) DomainKey-Status: good X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: hanskrentel@yahoo.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 77.238.189.214 nm17-vm0.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: from [77.238.189.214] ([77.238.189.214:45913] helo=nm17-vm0.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 31/56-48311-0AC4A105 for ; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 05:47:12 -0400 Received: from [77.238.189.234] by nm17.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Aug 2012 09:47:09 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.115] by tm15.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Aug 2012 09:47:09 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1024.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Aug 2012 09:47:09 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 492174.5917.bm@omp1024.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 99980 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Aug 2012 09:47:09 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.de; s=s1024; t=1343900829; bh=64opRkD9SmjCs2ghv+0fWtaUv5tfn8Uuoxj9GkDSEmE=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=YE9pVr5vMsI4WEFTGuV58vK4OMjY2G69j6q/TTR0GvkdYfDOjP9Sz8ATwea+/vxX8rJeYBZIHP2+GYHbk2F2CMsFd/mgIlgL8SL29/IKZBqfBJixWCZjIeXJs+3qGzAmTSZLlJUDuOUx+Zc70Yxq87594B/I3fcHpbs0IKCB/ig= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.de; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=P/e06reiwoj2Zo0N6outXRQFa0H4+WwFYKZc6IRH6FjiCz8ANIw83OwyESjfd3oCRw7P3ZtSpRT+MqNeaMm/CLcrR6Izjj4o+K58FDJSH+57mfcOKtYY2vJ5/+JGGdivcX4Ic7M3/uw82TDjzfUSyktM0+1Pbzz5lznMQ1f7PDs=; X-YMail-OSG: UqTLZ6UVM1mK6uf9MLrE8qF67T4RvlV9ELcbu_PgpbMDRtT 1mfYbTwYcrvpTqAaC9Ve9ZFwdJC91_HIAx4ANJtWNYhnIpX2pbkTsd4edHcY U85ZECxGrKbF5rmsgSV3eydnHSu1sSTpw1za9ZyezA.TWicler46whcW6NNB xKBQWKgKVnPbl3nsWFoRgi.lA8bw8WepyTS23zigdWxbpncw03UUfwVWcSVx umkofwlEVRNdoj7ZUABgPkLWm4ETO0ZvkBg1imWngFIxSQb9zzL7vVwpX5rB vxf_mII27o1iLVVB3IPeNvYcJSuY6HHsm3KwtMcTv7.Wno1BIXeyURkFAWiZ moW7Puuq8LAJN55a7qHUiiyXFAimr6xJ5d1sDT3D2ms9efZXDXmSe92yDfyJ nlI7YZNhznPQQn7NMq7titR65Imf3fG5nJJw4PQrvUZGHXL1.KSkNkF4qtDw Ogcz1L.CX4buT.tyV4JM6hf_zOZ3TIUSN5bxUMfIHMJaHYmrowPJsndOfAo4 f_w-- Received: from [79.225.48.21] by web133003.mail.ir2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 10:47:09 BST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.120.356233 References: <1343826814.77002.YahooMailNeo@web133004.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <5019715D.8030501@lerdorf.com> Message-ID: <1343900829.72607.YahooMailNeo@web133003.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:47:09 +0100 (BST) Reply-To: hakre To: Rasmus Lerdorf Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" In-Reply-To: <5019715D.8030501@lerdorf.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.x Documentend End Of Life Dates From: hanskrentel@yahoo.de (hakre) =0A=0A> No date for 5.3 yet. Depends how development goes on the next versi= on=0A> after 5.4. EOL announcements are in the release announcements. 5.2 E= OL=0A> was announced here: http://www.php.net/archive/2010.php#id2010-07-22= -1=0A=0AYes, I've seen that with release announcements often (but not alway= s) a =0A(more or less concrete) statement was given for support, but the na= ming =0Ais far from being consistent. For example, PHP 5.2 has multiple onc= es', =0Athree in total.=0A=0AActually the questions I asked initially were = born because of reading =0Athose announcements.=0A=0ASo if I may summarize = based on my own observations and your feedback:=0A=0A=A0* PHP 5.0 has no EO= L date (because there was never a release =0A=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= announcement with an EOL),=0A=A0* PHP 5.1 has one EOL date (2006-11-02 "Ob= soletion"), =0A=A0* PHP 5.2 has three EOL dates (2010-07-22 "End Of Active = Support"; =0A=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 2010-12-09 and 2010-12-16 "End = Of Support"), =0A=A0* PHP 5.3 has none yet (TBA) and =0A=A0* PHP 5.4 also h= as none yet even though the accepted release =0A=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0 procedure[1] suggests it has to have one already =0A=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0 (2015-03-01 "EOL").=0A=0ADoes this summary for EOL dates of 5.= x versions reflect the current =0Astatus quo appropriately?=0A=0AAnd what a= re the plans to practically introduce the accepted release =0Aprocedure? I = ask because it is documented and announced to be voted =0Ainto order but th= e feedback you have given so far suggests it is not =0Afor the End Of Life = dates. So I think this can benefit from some =0Aclarification, too.=0A=0ATh= ank you for your ongoing support=0A=0A-- hakre