Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:61947 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 63411 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2012 06:36:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Aug 2012 06:36:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=adam@adamharvey.name; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=adam@adamharvey.name; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain adamharvey.name designates 209.85.214.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: adam@adamharvey.name X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.170 mail-ob0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.170] ([209.85.214.170:55114] helo=mail-ob0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 4D/32-48311-FCF1A105 for ; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 02:35:59 -0400 Received: by obbwd18 with SMTP id wd18so558491obb.29 for ; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 23:35:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adamharvey.name; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mxVJHqbgJWVRI0HwTwgc30AjolXHdV3G4UnXdLzixRE=; b=WEUw3UWVlFsSQgm+iv/fdJDddbrSySDbmKNN3K9o/HA2laFKvdAZfcfeV7bEkdBQ5g A8/uCQtDZSvQzXG/t5t06QUImobfjMzhmjv8yA6GnXOBmd4i0CAwjNh9ZhxFaEqiPJkG sKkoaxdYuzdgIgClyjgP1lXoYlDrhoWkIjauQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=mxVJHqbgJWVRI0HwTwgc30AjolXHdV3G4UnXdLzixRE=; b=SBRzOSiPDapxhzLDwH7ozvr9nZWOP2Xz3uecz0BitQMpJBkxD9u0ToPnl05mrOmBTI 5jZ/ic6hiE3qC1YaB577PRHelsxozjkJtG6AecbcLklaa/+32jkJKJAW5K2ac0JQBXOy h9KmNYwLxm/HrVBuAhfF5MHGAVSjD8vrW4Ot1HfaI9Di8LsSv5j+zKu6M3SiW0514HwX B6k1tlOn/vurZ4iEeRuHVP30k1xp8zynvWuDf4DE1LwTqikWYARN8l5OhDCqwNdmwZ// 0FGNAoOKn7uqSDlkO3D7KedSZc8RclwCms/0cJDu1+kMA7dGKpuEyJiZFl4bsw34jRyP mdrQ== Received: by 10.182.52.42 with SMTP id q10mr33982509obo.46.1343889356445; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 23:35:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: adam@adamharvey.name Received: by 10.76.125.228 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 23:35:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1343826814.77002.YahooMailNeo@web133004.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <50197263.6060905@gmail.com> <50197934.5060005@lerdorf.com> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 14:35:36 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ms6T7UWbFKNi5t7hAU8lZLccRXA Message-ID: To: "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn7oPx3KOpt0+xkYBdN0+h4DYVYzTe9UACg5qx1cR/WfAz1kCQnh4fwYmueYpjt3j/qkcQF Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.x Documentend End Of Life Dates From: aharvey@php.net (Adam Harvey) On 2 August 2012 13:00, Adam Harvey wrote: > On 2 August 2012 12:30, Kris Craig wrote: >> First we'll need to consolidate the information regarding when each vers= ion >> was EOL'd. Are they all in news announcements, or are they scattered >> between announcements, listserv threads, etc? If we're going to do this= , >> we may as well cover as many of the /releases entries as possible; >> hopefully we'll be able to find the dates for most of them. >> >> Any ideas? I'd be happy to do the actual grunt work but I'm not sure wh= ere >> to look, particularly for older 4.x stuff. > > I'm having a look at this now =E2=80=94 we have enough information in the > release array to make this work pretty much automatically, I think. > > Should have something up to look at tonight. Or even this afternoon. :) I've added http://php.net/eol (coming soon to a mirror near you; it's not up yet): at present, it's pretty bare bones, just listing the date of the last release on each unsupported branch, and with an optional notes field. It's not linked from anywhere yet =E2=80=94 I have a patch tha= t will add it to the sidebar on /releases, as Rasmus suggested, but let's get the EOL page itself worked out first. Thoughts? (Do we even want to auto-fill this from $OLDRELEASES, or would we rather have a manual array?) Specific notes on vulnerabilities to add to branches? Better versions of the copy in the initial blurb? Adam