Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:61940 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 17823 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2012 18:45:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Aug 2012 18:45:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tyra3l@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tyra3l@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.42 mail-pb0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.160.42] ([209.85.160.42:46201] helo=mail-pb0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 18/8F-32875-84979105 for ; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 14:45:29 -0400 Received: by pbbrp12 with SMTP id rp12so1625438pbb.29 for ; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 11:45:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=i1VuLSnsNmTaTVftwxXcPyiA0xkjTLbFYhVxjFJKoaE=; b=Vad0hfiv8BDvFKdnDM96Jdn25CeM++kbe+yGuyW8a2eTw/I5nOlLbvGDwa0g+3JrWY lTMkQpH7wXRhZitR3lIYkn90uwjRzdo9ZdZdbq2w7aGmgwW9PxDiztgKpDOsa5BEXiUO GoJmg+xjLi8hk15QQxA58tBtdIdLF7BKcS1MLOTgivMEjuZNkvcsb1s+BunbWc0w9rNx MNJg2e15yXhkCPOWdxeaSwGZDPrKqam0GcZ9bqUFRTslFKteI1UyubSY+QyvaWE8ObBw wmPH+XJieiJ99PhMDRHwIipWxm2BeV7RlZbF8lqJWom52quJubk7dh+al+bwypxrwZag FaJw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.138.169 with SMTP id qr9mr54163429pbb.27.1343846725877; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 11:45:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.28.41 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 11:45:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <50197263.6060905@gmail.com> References: <1343826814.77002.YahooMailNeo@web133004.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <50197263.6060905@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 20:45:25 +0200 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?w4FuZ2VsIEdvbnrDoWxleg==?= Cc: Kris Craig , hakre , "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b15ae55ba7ebf04c638b264 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.x Documentend End Of Life Dates From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs) --047d7b15ae55ba7ebf04c638b264 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:16 PM, =C3=81ngel Gonz=C3=A1lez wrote: > On 01/08/12 20:02, Kris Craig wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:13 AM, hakre wrote: > > > >> I have some simple questions about PHP 5.x End Of Life (EOL) dates: > >> > >> PHP 5.0 - Is there some official news-item or changelog entry on > php.netthat says at which date PHP 5.0 went End Of Life? > >> > >> PHP 5.2 - Does the "End Of Support" that was announced twice for PHP 5= .2 > >> has the same meaning as "End Of Life"? > >> > >> Is there a reason why the naming has been changed btw? PHP 4 for examp= le > >> was declared End Of Life but it looks like it wasn't much of a mode to > use > >> that terminology until the 2011 RFC about the release process came to > life. > >> > >> And what about EOL of PHP 5.3, is there a date? According to the new > >> release process it is already EOL because it's over three years now, > >> however the RFC vote was in that lifetime so I assume that probably > there > >> is some transistion phase. If so, is there a planned date? Any > >> thoughts/plans about PHP 5.3 EOL? > >> > >> Cheers > >> > >> -- hakre > >> > > As far as I know (somebody please correct me if I'm wrong!), we provide > > legacy support to the previous tenths version increment only. In a > > practical sense, I think that essentially means EOL. Again, somebody > > please correct me if I'm mistaken, but I haven't seen any 5.2.x > commits/etc > > since 5.4 was introduced. It's no longer on the main downloads page. > > Whether it's "officially" EOL or not I'm not sure, but in a practical > > sense I think it basically is. > > > > --Kris > There should be a page like http://www.php.net/ancient-versions listing > the > versions with the date they went EOL and how much time has passed since > them. > Some scary warnings about "Known remote code execution vulnerabe" may be > good too. > The goal? To serve as single page where you point people when to > convince them > to upgrade. > > what should be the EOL date/version for the 5.2 branch? we released multiple versions after the first EOL announcement. --=20 Ferenc Kov=C3=A1cs @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu --047d7b15ae55ba7ebf04c638b264--