Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:61935 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 11690 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2012 18:19:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Aug 2012 18:19:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=keisial@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=keisial@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: keisial@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.170 mail-we0-f170.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.170] ([74.125.82.170:46660] helo=mail-we0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F7/3E-32875-62379105 for ; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 14:19:18 -0400 Received: by weyr1 with SMTP id r1so6117249wey.29 for ; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 11:19:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qyrgvC6v+Dt96RW141OHzvr4ZEaK+eWGd9Au39TlIrg=; b=Egc2ag4MLgIY+drR9LcULUGVbG4p1aKc0mp60pmSumclFty6h9GVYbd5AvDHJGDJF0 ZxyekixOTuNZQS9QI4LNPD3/bZvofrQ2Q0srZR4Sn560QNXAzgcEafQ/OSVG6HyT8bIv 3qyDQvPhhtSfGB0B8trpnzhVwsJkzffQV2ilKVRa/3XkY9L2+k/0gxvpDuBiGj5Q0DKp 249Kj+ssce8zzi5+6wFODWH4bxuu1xdNIlo+Q7iJ9HwyNcse7I7xTekxwyGXowUIfTFC kjk4gBqoc4X2Hc316/4QAF2ts/kT5BGwW8IcEQFZRLX6QiGEgqNhaXJJVpJG1PeKSIUF 8qTA== Received: by 10.180.102.136 with SMTP id fo8mr18464831wib.19.1343845155294; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 11:19:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.26] (47.Red-81-39-65.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net. [81.39.65.47]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ef5sm10491411wib.3.2012.08.01.11.19.13 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 01 Aug 2012 11:19:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <50197263.6060905@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 20:16:03 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Craig CC: hakre , "internals@lists.php.net" References: <1343826814.77002.YahooMailNeo@web133004.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.x Documentend End Of Life Dates From: keisial@gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C1ngel_Gonz=E1lez?=) On 01/08/12 20:02, Kris Craig wrote: > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:13 AM, hakre wrote: > >> I have some simple questions about PHP 5.x End Of Life (EOL) dates: >> >> PHP 5.0 - Is there some official news-item or changelog entry on php.netthat says at which date PHP 5.0 went End Of Life? >> >> PHP 5.2 - Does the "End Of Support" that was announced twice for PHP 5.2 >> has the same meaning as "End Of Life"? >> >> Is there a reason why the naming has been changed btw? PHP 4 for example >> was declared End Of Life but it looks like it wasn't much of a mode to use >> that terminology until the 2011 RFC about the release process came to life. >> >> And what about EOL of PHP 5.3, is there a date? According to the new >> release process it is already EOL because it's over three years now, >> however the RFC vote was in that lifetime so I assume that probably there >> is some transistion phase. If so, is there a planned date? Any >> thoughts/plans about PHP 5.3 EOL? >> >> Cheers >> >> -- hakre >> > As far as I know (somebody please correct me if I'm wrong!), we provide > legacy support to the previous tenths version increment only. In a > practical sense, I think that essentially means EOL. Again, somebody > please correct me if I'm mistaken, but I haven't seen any 5.2.x commits/etc > since 5.4 was introduced. It's no longer on the main downloads page. > Whether it's "officially" EOL or not I'm not sure, but in a practical > sense I think it basically is. > > --Kris There should be a page like http://www.php.net/ancient-versions listing the versions with the date they went EOL and how much time has passed since them. Some scary warnings about "Known remote code execution vulnerabe" may be good too. The goal? To serve as single page where you point people when to convince them to upgrade.