Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:61916
Return-Path: <sv_forums@fmethod.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 68418 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2012 12:00:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 1 Aug 2012 12:00:16 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=sv_forums@fmethod.com; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=sv_forums@fmethod.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain fmethod.com from 209.85.215.170 cause and error)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: sv_forums@fmethod.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.170 mail-ey0-f170.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.215.170] ([209.85.215.170:58493] helo=mail-ey0-f170.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 2D/06-32875-05A19105 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 08:00:16 -0400
Received: by eaao10 with SMTP id o10so1664928eaa.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 05:00:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:from:to:cc:references:subject:date:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority
         :x-mailer:x-mimeole:x-gm-message-state;
        bh=rYsCRvJwoOKg5izRkWIe7X73vbTLkd7E8Om6ARYenbI=;
        b=igJDjwpb56fH9evw1FANSfDreSrzz/bzvMdy7k1ri+rplwYjL16AKWc58SwmTIljUO
         whqwvwAgVR81F3+FqaURtC6On62ub0jugXH7zM5E/oxtJOAiim30lZ5hJYxo7zuL05RH
         UMJdC8uZ5iLkHlfjn4V4vnyJ0VOrUmkAVcnqd64oFAlVVZV5yLTJFoRejAep4gvMqTT0
         wzLQyefPdZFHAC/KGz9XBtuYaZD/NIq+z+lnIJQw0+rqHH35p5HpkgxgO4bpKC+7LPvL
         SXWpNcabp7j9ekWZim8EtLW89XoibyUqQyI8wjb6ZKLflIogMpMs0GNeWyqx2LLuTnFc
         zxaw==
Received: by 10.14.178.134 with SMTP id f6mr22364323eem.2.1343822412858;
        Wed, 01 Aug 2012 05:00:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pc (79-100-60-213.btc-net.bg. [79.100.60.213])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o47sm8339065eem.0.2012.08.01.05.00.11
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Wed, 01 Aug 2012 05:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <C3D234BD7B23490FB0BBFDCAA80CB6E9@pc>
To: "Stefan Marr" <php@stefan-marr.de>
Cc: <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <232501B15F7F4B3197123F219370E36D@pc> <A9048740-0311-4A3E-AF7A-77650F997790@stefan-marr.de>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 15:00:03 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="ISO-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmld9aW6s06shs86RDa4x2BbnbuZIL9soZdfcl/bQzsVGUEHrHstByR4uju654gRWZ3Tp55
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Traits behavior still up in the air in 5.4
From: sv_forums@fmethod.com ("Stan Vass")

> Could you please point me *exactly* to the paragraph where we have 
> something written about static properties? I do not see that I wrote 
> anything special about static properties in the RFC. And I do not find it 
> in the docs either. static properties should work like normal properties.

I'd like to add something to my answer to this question: while I've added a 
doc bug for this quote I gave, people handling the documentation *don't want 
to fix it*, because they think static members *should notwork* in traits, 
this is how they read the RFC for some reson. Thus a clear sign people are 
confused about this behavior. It has to be clarified.

Stan.