Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:61816 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 1805 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2012 16:37:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Jul 2012 16:37:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.155 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.155 smtp155.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.155] ([67.192.241.155:38828] helo=smtp155.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2F/76-02574-C2271105 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:37:01 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp32.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 19382502D2; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:36:57 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp32.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 742A150387; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:36:56 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <50117227.7090709@sugarcrm.com> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 09:36:55 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9oYW5uZXMgU2NobMO8dGVy?= CC: PHP internals list , Stas Malyshev , David Soria Parra References: <1343317268.1801.55.camel@guybrush> In-Reply-To: <1343317268.1801.55.camel@guybrush> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Release Frequency, NEWS, etc. From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > The current idea would be to skip every second release (unless security > issues demand something else) both in release date as well as version > number. So for instance 5.4.6 will be released sometime next month > alone. A month later there will be 5.3.17 and 5.4.7. I think it makes sense. > > Doing this has an obvious issue, though: NEWS entries are currently only > placed in the lowest branch. With the example from above and the current > way the NEWS are handled 5.4.6 NEWS would be quite small and there would > be no 5.3 NEWS to check for further things. I think note in the NEWS should be placed immediately when the bug is fixed (at least the lowest version NEWS). However, if we want the bug to appear in all NEWS for both 5.4 and 5.3, I think we'd have to ask people to put note in both. I, on my part, am reviewing NEWS periodically and merge entries that I can find that are in 5.3 but not in 5.4. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227