Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:61658 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 38468 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2012 08:32:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Jul 2012 08:32:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.113 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.113 smtp113.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.113] ([67.192.241.113:46625] helo=smtp113.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B1/88-17533-0BD5E005 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 04:32:48 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp11.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9561FD038C; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 04:32:45 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp11.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 4106AD0321; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 04:32:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <500E5DAC.2060000@sugarcrm.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 01:32:44 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ferenc Kovacs CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: <5007D707.2070100@hoa-project.net> <5009669D.6030807@hoa-project.net> <500E3566.40802@hoa-project.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: finally, was: Make try/catch brackets optinal From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > For finally see https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=32100 > > it seems that the core devs don't like the idea, but that feature request > seems to have a lot of supporters, and comes up frequently. I haven't seen it come with a pull req though ;) BTW, look at how finally is implemented in Java, for example, to see why it may not be that easy to do it properly. But if somebody would provide the RFC with a patch, we could discuss it and run a vote and see if it has any support now or not. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227