Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:61618
Return-Path: <ajfweb@googlemail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 5457 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2012 12:11:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 21 Jul 2012 12:11:19 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ajfweb@googlemail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ajfweb@googlemail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain googlemail.com designates 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ajfweb@googlemail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.54 mail-wg0-f54.google.com  
Received: from [74.125.82.54] ([74.125.82.54:43824] helo=mail-wg0-f54.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id B4/62-27309-76C9A005 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 08:11:19 -0400
Received: by wgx1 with SMTP id 1so3460816wgx.11
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 05:11:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=+/hPMMtYr+ztcb8MXHA+hqyNTHQaa59XAx0bbMwo1as=;
        b=kYWbseZBBfol65xcJ+taLtSNHfoOD+QqpL2K0aptx3Qf0OFMDmLrCbyj6bme7frobX
         sErQt9yov6LqecXGI19xJGGgPAaw+Cb3ir6lDTYSwXA8tQqu5RMh2Mh5xvGLEvrWGnJq
         lSAXoTM6FYoh290NlCH598bAhefnr0u0w+rnulHTbhI2dvk9cO+iIVgw09mtMKgQ66Cc
         x+jeepYN2NfdZ1tP/mfXHhqP5KJWHkP9KK/1lMKfxv7y4MaZBDFaJgQQjvjLqymzwzv/
         dXU3+DIzxxOlNWDcc0CMgJ96FNjfXMQDnSj4axo9+GpGnk6TZ0dB+h3sidbKbIuUS//H
         1RCQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.220.89 with SMTP id n67mr5943606wep.73.1342872676261; Sat,
 21 Jul 2012 05:11:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.160.16 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 05:11:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.160.16 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 05:11:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <500A9B8A.1060303@gmail.com>
References: <CADqTB_jrj__c-1d=F2zuK_Rj4J_HpXkrqPgA3J57Nxi7WBTBTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU63bsDYPqcfTQm7sG+9w90NU_pr5hn-ekCYAJHQde4r2Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAN+gjSc2FYvTp9+Ni+371nUFmr4ej6Q-q7QhFp6tiDrVQE3CQg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU5B9bkVh=zDSb91nX=wDbEufD9dGjedsue9xTodtNeZ+g@mail.gmail.com>
	<500A9B8A.1060303@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 13:11:16 +0100
Message-ID: <CAN+gjSetd4YdT=RJBB7Z9bXEfkAmV6L8pnEhsn0BK5p=y4oH5w@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?B?w4FuZ2VsIEdvbnrDoWxleg==?= <keisial@gmail.com>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>, 
	Rasmus Schultz <rasmus@mindplay.dk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d77ce3d8e14904c555e838
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] common issue with version_compare()
From: ajfweb@googlemail.com (Andrew Faulds)

--0016e6d77ce3d8e14904c555e838
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Maybe it should have an optional extra parameter specifying comparison
"mode"? (I.e. version formatting)
On Jul 21, 2012 1:08 PM, "=C3=81ngel Gonz=C3=A1lez" <keisial@gmail.com> wro=
te:

> On 21/07/12 11:32, Pierre Joye wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > No, I mean version with 1.0 and not 1.0.0 are not. They are just not
> > correct and confusing, as you noticed.
> Then Linux 2.6.39 shouldn't have been followed by Linux 3.0
>
> For me, 1.0 and 1.0.0 are the same thing.
>
> It's fine if x.y is not a valid "PHP-standardized" version number,
> and version_compare is thus undefined for it (despite lack of
> definition of what forms a "PHP-standardized" version number).
> But forcing third-parties to change their release numbers just to
> please version_compare() is non-sense.
> And if versoin_compare behavior is undefined for them, it can
> (theoretically) be harmlessly changed.
>
>
>

--0016e6d77ce3d8e14904c555e838--