Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:61138 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 69400 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2012 20:17:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Jul 2012 20:17:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.123 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.123 smtp123.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.123] ([67.192.241.123:54704] helo=smtp123.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 92/1F-01957-A6FDDFF4 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 16:17:46 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp12.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 87D673C12A6; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 16:17:43 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp12.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 34E273C12B6; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 16:17:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FFDDF66.2070806@sugarcrm.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 13:17:42 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Joye CC: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Johannes_Schl=FCter?= , PHP Internals References: <4FFD11C1.3090007@sugarcrm.com> <1342029955.13569.17.camel@guybrush> <4FFDC10F.6050106@sugarcrm.com> <4FFDDBAD.7070100@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: bug 18556 - tolower & locales From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > Right, just like some functions are huge issues for the few people using them. And we regularly fix bugs in such functions in stable versions. > If it is not good enough for 5.3, it is not good enough for 5.4. Sorry, I can't accept this argument. There were numerous things that are in 5.4 but not in 5.3. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227