Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:61135 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 61651 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2012 19:53:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Jul 2012 19:53:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.123 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.123 smtp123.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.123] ([67.192.241.123:45717] helo=smtp123.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 67/5D-01957-0C9DDFF4 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:53:37 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp12.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 33E463C1254; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:53:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp12.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id BB8473C03AE; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:53:32 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FFDD9BC.6090103@sugarcrm.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:53:32 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hannes Magnusson CC: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9oYW5uZXMgU2NobMO8dGVy?= , PHP Internals References: <4FFD11C1.3090007@sugarcrm.com> <1342029955.13569.17.camel@guybrush> <4FFDC10F.6050106@sugarcrm.com> <4FFDC19B.70901@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: bug 18556 - tolower & locales From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > It is a thing that can have really weird cascading affects. > > Everything from strcmp() to == and sort() could start behaving differently. Why? Neither of them is case insensitive, why would they start behaving differently? And sort has nothing to do with it at all, lowercasing does not affect sorting in any way I'm aware of. Could you please explain what you mean? > The test cases for such a feature change surely should cover more then > the letter "I". They should and they do. Why did you conclude it only covers letter I? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227