Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:61114
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zerocue.com designates 74.115.204.40 as permitted sender)
To: Benjamin Eberlei <kontakt@beberlei.de>
CC: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>, "internals@lists.php.net"
	<internals@lists.php.net>
Thread-Topic: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Property get/set syntax
Thread-Index: AQIDtoEcVZsXNKIcUjIkjZWAqDpT2wI2zibcAdygaHYBNHn7fQFcz5kRAngSp5WWaqZ10A==
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 02:46:40 +0000
Message-ID: <9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE4855867BD45@MBX202.domain.local>
References: <9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE485546B0737@MBX202.domain.local>
	<4F910311.7040406@sugarcrm.com>
	<9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE48555BE6562@MBX202.domain.local>
	<4F937C00.3090104@sugarcrm.com>
	<9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE48555BE665A@MBX202.domain.local>
 <CAEPJdu=MrR-EtP7ztU1mqmAMGhZzJMvGjjZa5FNn0-zaMFr0AQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEPJdu=MrR-EtP7ztU1mqmAMGhZzJMvGjjZa5FNn0-zaMFr0AQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="_000_9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE4855867BD45MBX202domainloc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Property get/set syntax
From: cpriest@zerocue.com (Clint Priest)

--_000_9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE4855867BD45MBX202domainloc_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I've just recently had my second child and closed on a new house, so been a=
 bit busy.  I'll be working to finish up what's left in the coming weeks.

Right now I'm told there are some conflicts with a merge from master that I=
 have to resolve, then the fork will be ready for playing around with.  Hop=
efully I'll have that fixed up later this week.

From: Benjamin Eberlei [mailto:kontakt@beberlei.de]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 4:55 AM
To: Clint Priest
Cc: Stas Malyshev; internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Property get/set syntax

What is the state here with regard to merge into php-src?
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Clint M Priest <cpriest@zerocue.com<mailto=
:cpriest@zerocue.com>> wrote:


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stas Malyshev [mailto:smalyshev@sugarcrm.com<mailto:smalyshev@sugar=
crm.com>]
> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2012 10:33 PM
> To: Clint M Priest
> Cc: internals@lists.php.net<mailto:internals@lists.php.net>
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Property get/set syntax
>
> Hi!
>
> > empty() - Returns true for a property retrieved via __get() or via a
> > getter -- Any idea why this would be the case for __get()?  Is this a
> > bug?
>
> isset() calls __isset(), empty() calls __isset() and __get(). I'm not sur=
e what exactly you consider to be a bug.
I see, well the only way to resolve this would be to add isset and unset pr=
operty functions as well.

Anyone against it?

>
> > unset() - Would unset a temporary variable (the one returned by the
> > getter) -- see previous email re: adding unset/isset property
> > functions.
>
> unset() calls __unset().
>
> > sort() - Does the same thing as with __get()/__set() which is to say,
> > the array is sorted but the property is not updated with the value.
> > Should accessor behave differently than the magic methods?  Should
> > this just be documents or should this be fixed?
>
> sort() works just fine if you define __get to return by-ref.
Returning by reference was not documented in the original RFC, would this s=
yntax work for everyone?

public $Hours {
       &get { return $this->a; }
}

>
> --
> Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
> SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
> (408)454-6900 ext. 227<tel:%28408%29454-6900%20ext.%20227>

--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


--_000_9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE4855867BD45MBX202domainloc_--