Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:61110 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 97864 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2012 23:10:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Jul 2012 23:10:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.133 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.133 smtp133.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.133] ([67.192.241.133:56131] helo=smtp133.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 18/00-31376-96077FF4 for ; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 19:10:34 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp13.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 2C1EB3D01B4; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 19:10:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp13.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id D8F693D0173; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 19:10:29 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FF77065.101@sugarcrm.com> Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 16:10:29 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lonny Kapelushnik CC: PHP Internals References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PATCH] Feature 55218 - SimpleXML namespaces From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > Can someone please let me know if I'm doing something wrong in trying to > get this committed? > > Am I doing something procedurally wrong or is it normal for nobody to > respond? Usually it helps to talk to extension maintainer (list of them in in EXTENSIONS file). Speaking of the patch, could you explain what is it returning when recursive is set but from_root is false? Besides that, it looks OK but also needs NEWS and UPGRADING descriptions. Please add those and I think it can be merged. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227