Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:61097 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 15270 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2012 16:57:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Jul 2012 16:57:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=arvids.godjuks@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=arvids.godjuks@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.49 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: arvids.godjuks@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.216.49 mail-qa0-f49.google.com Received: from [209.85.216.49] ([209.85.216.49:36728] helo=mail-qa0-f49.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 73/C3-30242-B7423FF4 for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 12:57:31 -0400 Received: by qabj40 with SMTP id j40so3105157qab.8 for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 09:57:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=qiXXoeMK2RLH/4/PRLjYeqVfb8JMgjvMHQTyxF7BFms=; b=GeC6/obwp/ddAdWQaCAHc1cLgMODqQes2nk/Up8EvuxdVa92P/r0lVqQr5JTOxZkbn PyCjoD9ED6Te1ERiyAEJlwNqsZmzNSxu623qhBQ6HaPoXxP/W4M1HsLHwqQ045HRKAHh MnPSfD13frGXrbiZilfzo1uPEzx47zccRjGSi3l/+WxD/WcFHBRQ90nQvU0btKAXPRxc pTEiAfP1v+a8qt4b4g/XJsIYbYEIvi43ZWcnJ+153grfRbdsQcmmmCL+NyMyfNYPwnQi nb1B15PX5uPSsRqUUb10JEJh0RGUM2xRJ3D06bHtcgGo2sj4E5pGNvJWWaXyJw4SLOev 19Xg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.76.137 with SMTP id k9mr10960084igw.25.1341334648410; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 09:57:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.164.134 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 09:57:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.164.134 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 09:57:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FF323D5.6060002@lerdorf.com> References: <4FF2FFBF.8050301@lerdorf.com> <4FF323D5.6060002@lerdorf.com> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 19:57:28 +0300 Message-ID: To: Rasmus Lerdorf Cc: PHP Internals , Tom Boutell , Pierre Joye Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f23433b3e53ac04c3efcf8e Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Is the fix for #61238 in PHP 5.4.4 & pecl yet? From: arvids.godjuks@gmail.com (Arvids Godjuks) --e89a8f23433b3e53ac04c3efcf8e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Could be, xcache is definetly dummer in features and it is its feature. I guess it helps it to keep up with releases. I will investigate this today, maybe get some interesting results worth to share here. 03.07.2012 16:54 =D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=BB=D1=8C=D0=B7=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=B0=D1=82=D0= =B5=D0=BB=D1=8C "Rasmus Lerdorf" =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0= =B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB: > On 07/03/2012 09:49 AM, Arvids Godjuks wrote: > > One one side it's good to know i'm not wrong, on the other hand it's sa= d > > in this case. > > Sure about one thing - xcache is worth looking at and may be a better > > choise than APC and has better potential. > > One thing sure - I haven't heard anyone complaining about xcache. And > > heard many complains about APC. > > Well, that is simply not true. We get a lot of, "I tried xcache, but it > didn't work, so now I am trying APC" type of messages and bug reports in > the APC world. > > -Rasmus > > > --e89a8f23433b3e53ac04c3efcf8e--