Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:61051
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.170 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOfKkdQkm8OvHAR42VQfG0Rt6LF9NbU1BFdevTA+ynGdiX8OcQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPaKmRn-1wAuicC+VRkB8+2U9fBix6iY03UmXyQOBZE+4fZPqA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPaKmR=pQ7Yevo4AzF0hGxFFmcLKg_mE5C6U6c-FZFnyOH_ZZQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOfKkdQkm8OvHAR42VQfG0Rt6LF9NbU1BFdevTA+ynGdiX8OcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:09:57 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKxcST_WyEVCA+FhyWZis8KpuDZbc+qDWuMpdVeQgwKAKe=Rcw@mail.gmail.com>
To: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04478755661fb104c3a3b502
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC proposal - Syntactic sugar for cloning
From: dragoonis@gmail.com (Paul Dragoonis)

--f46d04478755661fb104c3a3b502
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

My input is that we should be focusing on features that PHP lacks, or
fixing bugs rather than adding more sugar syntax just for the sake of
adding it.

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Pierrick Charron <pierrick@webstart.fr>wro=
te:

> No problem when you'll come in Montreal ! If you need any help don't
> hesitate.
>
> Pierrick
>
> On 29 June 2012 14:27, Amaury Bouchard <amaury@amaury.net> wrote:
>
> > Yes, guys. I totally understand your point. As I said, I had this idea =
in
> > a dreamed context (good or bad dream? I don't know).
> > But still, I think it's intellectually interesting, even if it's not a
> > good concept for PHP.  :-)
> >
> > Pierrick, I owe you a beer  ;-)
> > Le 29 juin 2012 19:06, "Pierrick Charron" <pierrick@webstart.fr> a
> =E9crit :
> >
>

--f46d04478755661fb104c3a3b502--