Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:61039
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.42 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAyV7nFE6+XJ-0F=jKq4u-bYr94UTm5-rpXBD+7bscR0_KbfRQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAyV7nEw5uLC05dz+kqCrFtUJ9yOUeKvR6uZTGo8E6+TjYMoUA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU4bnjS5_gA0PQT+3QhO0Sa09EZ6VE-2xzSJpJDsamDSaw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAyV7nF7yKEuEimxtoiLb3u26bUTazN1Y4JVxAO5DaS2M0w4dw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU52b5aJHOmPrqP6NdViqJh4k8zP3So9DY72yBsOAh6sEA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAyV7nFE6+XJ-0F=jKq4u-bYr94UTm5-rpXBD+7bscR0_KbfRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:19:05 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAyV7nGROOyyYx8MXM5dmbX6uX=VVVYnFmohastOU2WT+6UB5w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Add hash_pbkdf2 function
From: ircmaxell@gmail.com (Anthony Ferrara)

Bumping this for a last call RFC.

It will be 2 weeks on Monday since the proposal, and since there's not
been a lot of traffic on the discussion, I'm planning on putting it up
to a vote at that time (unless there are any major objections raised).

So if anyone wants to comment prior to the vote, please do so!

https://wiki.php.net/rfc/hash_pbkdf2

Anthony

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Anthony Ferrara <ircmaxell@gmail.com> wrote:
> Pierre,
>
>>>> I would update the RFC with the current available algorithms or
>>>> recommended to be used (depending on the usage or goal).
>>>
>>> When you say "currently available algorithms", are you talking about
>>> the hash library as a whole? Or recommended for use with PBKDF2? Or
>>> other iterated stretching algorithms similar to PBKDF2?
>>
>> The algos recommended to use with PBKDF2.
>
> I just updated the RFC to include a description of the non-obvious
> parameters ($password isn't described). I also included a bit on
> algorithm selection in there.
>
> Take a peak and let me know if that satisfies what you were looking
> for, or if it needs to be expanded further.
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Anthony