Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60837 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 28419 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2012 16:46:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Jun 2012 16:46:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=johannes@schlueters.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=johannes@schlueters.de; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain schlueters.de from 217.114.211.66 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: johannes@schlueters.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.114.211.66 config.schlueters.de Received: from [217.114.211.66] ([217.114.211.66:48553] helo=config.schlueters.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C5/7F-39100-A451ADF4 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:46:03 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.230] (ppp-88-217-87-196.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.87.196]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by config.schlueters.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 702F961D16; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 18:45:59 +0200 (CEST) To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C1ngel_Gonz=E1lez?= Cc: Michael Felt , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <4FDA10CA.5060301@gmail.com> References: <4FDA10CA.5060301@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 18:45:58 +0200 Message-ID: <1339692358.2537.39.camel@guybrush> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Confusion on how to exclude embedded sqlite3 during make/build From: johannes@schlueters.de (Johannes =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Schl=FCter?=) On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 18:26 +0200, Ángel González wrote: > What do you have at those lines? As it mentions "Undeclared identifier > or.", > perhaps it's (wrongly) taking the slash at "and/or " as a "*/" ?? > That would be very broken of a compiler... No, that's invalid C89 code and a quite standards compliant C89 compiler. johannes