Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60755 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 92267 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2012 09:51:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Jun 2012 09:51:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:42925] helo=xdebug.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 0E/53-08677-B382FCF4 for ; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 05:51:56 -0400 Received: from host3.msm.che.vodafone (unknown [212.183.128.128]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 35B5CDE13F; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 10:51:51 +0100 (BST) References: User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:51:34 +0200 To: David Soria Parra ,internals@lists.php.net Message-ID: <9a2db39a-1bf2-4f7d-9713-2c6672d51783@email.android.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] boolval() again From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) David Soria Parra wrote: > Going through the 26 open pull requests (please let us work on getting > that number down), I stumbled over > https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/60. > > This was already proposed on the mailinglits, but the thread died fast > without > a satisfying answer on whether to add a function boolval() or not. > > Personally I would like to see the function in. Having a complete set > of XYZval() functions is a good reason for me to add that function. > The > implementation is simple and straight forward and easy to maintain. > > Do we need an RFC for that simple pull request or can we just go ahead > and pull it? Pull it. Derick