Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60660 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 53564 invoked from network); 22 May 2012 17:42:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 May 2012 17:42:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tom@punkave.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tom@punkave.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain punkave.com designates 209.85.161.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tom@punkave.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.170 mail-gg0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.161.170] ([209.85.161.170:61399] helo=mail-gg0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id FA/B0-49069-220DBBF4 for ; Tue, 22 May 2012 13:42:58 -0400 Received: by ggnf2 with SMTP id f2so6376926ggn.29 for ; Tue, 22 May 2012 10:42:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=PTvyvi70VFugdrdifQj5DPmstq3M9VNFjiZPx6lp+GM=; b=E5yLhobc2PBnbD8G1jUs74aJsZvsBx1Pll9foVVNLLcw+EZ54RcLEOMOtMKqNgDL8q cnIATRFZUdkW2jOu/V4D08q7fflGqj9UFTYM85IlifiirzPqP5iHxRWZ7BR+7jtJ+Vau 5TDMv9Z3AUYJe2v6m7hlcJAuTrozyqQMgOKjEecm8BAvpOivSCnxGT9j5hfxYK/vdR+C 5EHjz1NdXsj4gw1RmVQg/Ab0QC3ijIxD+/XHZpqSoq7We+4j749/8bGIdoH5lA84er9v 1Lzi4Vy27dn6dA1Rq5E9gjXBtclqu4531n1Aq3Y1TkzU/xIZUGBMpvd31LTXsyO56mbZ gR0A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.201.229 with SMTP id b65mr28708946yho.80.1337708575121; Tue, 22 May 2012 10:42:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.109.13 with HTTP; Tue, 22 May 2012 10:42:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 13:42:55 -0400 Message-ID: Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmK4Q/Y1ZKYWJbWje8SM2mzjQ3i6TQ4OMp94WwZOmr9U+qrp7mmh9VPvWTlI3edajzzSJaI Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] APC benchmark From: tom@punkave.com (Tom Boutell) Including Wordpress in your test does sound fairly realistic actually, but it's a good sign that something else becomes the bottleneck with APC enabled (: On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Mohammad Saleh wrote: > Thank you for the feedback Tom. > > I actually created a simulated test with jmeter and wordpress and was > testing that with and without apc (simulation of a set of authors and > readers). > Once I turned on APC, I realized my db server became a bottleneck and I was > not able to test the max throughput. > > Your scenario removes the db and focuses strictly on the cached pages, so I > will give that a try. > > Thanks and if there are any other suggestions, please do let me know! > > - Mohammad > >> Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 11:38:56 -0400 >> From: tom@punkave.com >> To: internals@lists.php.net >> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] APC benchmark > >> >> You might be better off testing a nontrivial case like a framework >> based web application's homepage with and without APC turned on for >> 100 fetches. That's where APC really shines. >> >> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Mohammad Saleh >> wrote: >> > >> > All, >> > >> > I was looking for a standard benchmark script that I could run with and >> > without apc caching to see the general gains. >> > Is there something that is used by the internals team for such tests? >> > If not, are there any recommendations? >> > >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Mohammad >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Tom Boutell >> P'unk Avenue >> 215 755 1330 >> punkave.com >> window.punkave.com >> >> -- >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> -- Tom Boutell P'unk Avenue 215 755 1330 punkave.com window.punkave.com