Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60659 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 49207 invoked from network); 22 May 2012 16:46:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 May 2012 16:46:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=msaleh811@hotmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=msaleh811@hotmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain hotmail.com designates 65.54.190.22 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: msaleh811@hotmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 65.54.190.22 bay0-omc1-s11.bay0.hotmail.com Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [65.54.190.22] ([65.54.190.22:13483] helo=bay0-omc1-s11.bay0.hotmail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E5/00-49069-CF2CBBF4 for ; Tue, 22 May 2012 12:46:53 -0400 Received: from BAY171-W41 ([65.54.190.60]) by bay0-omc1-s11.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 22 May 2012 09:46:49 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_b3bf4c32-fe9b-401b-bf0f-8714a294ecc8_" X-Originating-IP: [163.181.251.103] To: , Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 12:46:49 -0400 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: , MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 May 2012 16:46:49.0754 (UTC) FILETIME=[7BA8EFA0:01CD383A] Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] APC benchmark From: msaleh811@hotmail.com (Mohammad Saleh) --_b3bf4c32-fe9b-401b-bf0f-8714a294ecc8_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thank you for the feedback Tom. I actually created a simulated test with jmeter and wordpress and was testi= ng that with and without apc (simulation of a set of authors and readers). Once I turned on APC=2C I realized my db server became a bottleneck and I w= as not able to test the max throughput. Your scenario removes the db and focuses strictly on the cached pages=2C so= I will give that a try. Thanks and if there are any other suggestions=2C please do let me know! - Mohammad > Date: Tue=2C 22 May 2012 11:38:56 -0400 > From: tom@punkave.com > To: internals@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] APC benchmark >=20 > You might be better off testing a nontrivial case like a framework > based web application's homepage with and without APC turned on for > 100 fetches. That's where APC really shines. >=20 > On Tue=2C May 22=2C 2012 at 11:18 AM=2C Mohammad Saleh wrote: > > > > All=2C > > > > I was looking for a standard benchmark script that I could run with and= without apc caching to see the general gains. > > Is there something that is used by the internals team for such tests? > > If not=2C are there any recommendations? > > > > > > Thanks=2C > > Mohammad > > >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Tom Boutell > P'unk Avenue > 215 755 1330 > punkave.com > window.punkave.com >=20 > --=20 > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe=2C visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >=20 = --_b3bf4c32-fe9b-401b-bf0f-8714a294ecc8_--