Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60654 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 35857 invoked from network); 22 May 2012 14:35:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 May 2012 14:35:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ceo@l-i-e.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ceo@l-i-e.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain l-i-e.com designates 67.139.134.202 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ceo@l-i-e.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.139.134.202 o2.hostbaby.com FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.3) (2) Received: from [67.139.134.202] ([67.139.134.202:3809] helo=o2.hostbaby.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 30/72-22099-614ABBF4 for ; Tue, 22 May 2012 10:35:03 -0400 Received: (qmail 26582 invoked by uid 98); 22 May 2012 14:35:01 -0000 Received: from localhost by o2.hostbaby.com (envelope-from , uid 1013) with qmail-scanner-2.05 ( Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.03703 secs); 22 May 2012 14:35:01 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO www.l-i-e.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 May 2012 14:35:01 -0000 Received: from webmail (SquirrelMail authenticated user ceo@l-i-e.com) by www.l-i-e.com with HTTP; Tue, 22 May 2012 09:35:01 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <4FB0AE18.1060902@sugarcrm.com> Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 09:35:01 -0500 To: internals@lists.php.net User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21 [SVN] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE] Vote change for empty() RFC From: ceo@l-i-e.com ("Richard Lynch") On Sun, May 20, 2012 5:44 pm, Pierre Joye wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Rafael Dohms > wrote: >> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Anthony Ferrara >> wrote: >> >>> I had meant to reply to the list, but I had replied to Stas >>> directly. >>> I would be happy to change my vote from isset() and empty() to >>> empty() >>> only if that's what it would take... >>> >>> Anthony >> >> This would settle it, so in the realm of "action" what can we do >> now? >> Is there a rule that allows to call for a re-vote? >> Should start a new RFC? >> Or can we just alter the vote and consider this the "end of voting"? >> >> Sorry, but all this talking is running around in circles, and >> everything has been said. I would like to bring closure to this >> topic. > > See the previous mails, as long as other voters agree to change their > votes to empty only, we are done. I had voted none. I really don't care about empty, because it has changed edge cases in every major release, so I can't use it. Therefore and herewith, I officially change my "none" vote to "empty only" Please put a fork in it and call it done. -- brain cancer update: http://richardlynch.blogspot.com/search/label/brain%20tumor Donate: https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=FS9NLTNEEKWBE