Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60641 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 60284 invoked from network); 21 May 2012 21:25:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 May 2012 21:25:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain nebm.ist.utl.pt from 193.136.128.21 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt X-Host-Fingerprint: 193.136.128.21 smtp1.ist.utl.pt Linux 2.6 Received: from [193.136.128.21] ([193.136.128.21:60697] helo=smtp1.ist.utl.pt) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 92/18-16352-8B2BABF4 for ; Mon, 21 May 2012 17:25:13 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.ist.utl.pt (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B65470004D1 for ; Mon, 21 May 2012 22:25:09 +0100 (WEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.6.4 (20090625) (Debian) at ist.utl.pt Received: from smtp1.ist.utl.pt ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.ist.utl.pt [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with LMTP id VqnE2rrTdPiJ for ; Mon, 21 May 2012 22:25:09 +0100 (WEST) Received: from mail2.ist.utl.pt (mail.ist.utl.pt [IPv6:2001:690:2100:1::8]) by smtp1.ist.utl.pt (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5534E70004AE for ; Mon, 21 May 2012 22:25:09 +0100 (WEST) Received: from damnation (damnation-air.nl.lo.geleia.net [IPv6:2001:470:94a2:4:7d06:1af1:ea64:2d52]) (Authenticated sender: ist155741) by mail2.ist.utl.pt (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 083792005285 for ; Mon, 21 May 2012 22:25:07 +0100 (WEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: internals@lists.php.net References: <4FB0AE18.1060902@sugarcrm.com> <29C59974-B01A-4D38-825D-0243479B656F@strojny.net> Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 23:25:05 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable Organization: =?utf-8?Q?N=C3=BAcleo_de_Eng=2E_Biom=C3=A9di?= =?utf-8?Q?ca_do_I=2ES=2ET=2E?= Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.64 (Win32) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Vote change for empty() RFC From: glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt ("Gustavo Lopes") On Mon, 21 May 2012 23:18:03 +0200, Rafael Dohms = wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Lars Strojny wrot= e: >> >> hope it=E2=80=99s ok I've reopened the vote temporarily, but you=E2=80= =99ve got the = >> missing vote. > > Even better, get this on clean papers. thanks. > > But i would still like Pierre and others involved with voting to clear= > up the point about rounding up or down. > There is nothing unclear about "a 2/3 majority is required". 2/3 of all = = the votes need not be a integer, but that doesn't mean you can't compare= = it to an integer. If this still doesn't answer your question, please ref= er = to how this works in virtually every election in the world. -- = Gustavo Lopes