Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60618 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 56136 invoked from network); 20 May 2012 23:05:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 May 2012 23:05:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=listas@rafaeldohms.com.br; sender-id=fail Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=listas@rafaeldohms.com.br; spf=fail; sender-id=fail Received-SPF: fail (pb1.pair.com: domain rafaeldohms.com.br does not designate 209.85.217.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: listas@rafaeldohms.com.br X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.217.170 mail-lb0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.217.170] ([209.85.217.170:43981] helo=mail-lb0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D7/F9-15660-2C879BF4 for ; Sun, 20 May 2012 19:05:38 -0400 Received: by lbgc1 with SMTP id c1so3319054lbg.29 for ; Sun, 20 May 2012 16:05:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=Rn6Ga2kBuNaG++zOBEZowpm0y6rZfTVwV9vjqsOZimg=; b=jeVXoebPEFVKRK7y+UhHL89u+U43H3qXYZ7QLZ4ZPlt5lj6uPdKsxNpV16s/6lD2k9 MNjb7kU2ICAvOPIenFJS9ebtS1aCkBuHoGaVWFR44M5KZlOovI6mFCl54TjYfx+EYy9g vra6h/NP/bV/6gwgo75IXT8RI3jyzzy9DAiBx9YLxWbiU0Xs7DqAmq5QhN5BhdxBqU09 aP8vZ+dj4yjBCaEFw277gN0AwFK95iJtP+aUuWyN7wgWNylMRGgr50hJSfuFydFHweR7 Sp6B2fy9S7pSmTFWfJv3PjzUQVQM1Kb50VPKNoJutPKNL61XINTaLrw07rahQkWeM5FF WtsA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.103.135 with SMTP id fw7mr7885410lbb.25.1337555134965; Sun, 20 May 2012 16:05:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.145.194 with HTTP; Sun, 20 May 2012 16:05:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4FB0AE18.1060902@sugarcrm.com> Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 01:05:34 +0200 Message-ID: To: Pierre Joye Cc: Anthony Ferrara , Stas Malyshev , Nikita Popov , "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkAh6/yw7qdk0rLW+pfY1ayPWBuhkCcOIZ/uOeHSzVreE3TWbfjRAuqk37ZOvOOJcq09UOL Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE] Vote change for empty() RFC From: listas@rafaeldohms.com.br (Rafael Dohms) On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: > > > See the previous mails, as long as other voters agree to change their > votes to empty only, we are done. If my math does not fail me, we needed one more vote to have the 2/3 mentioned. Anthony has changed his vote, i think we are good to go. 20 votes => 2/3 = 13.3 So if we round down, the vote originally passed, and in any case Anthony makes it 14, so that should resolve any doubts Also, for future votes we need to make this rule clear: does 13.3 mean we need 13 votes or 14 votes to pass? In which case, this whole thread might actually have been for nothing since the vote had already passed. -- Rafael Dohms PHP Evangelist and Community Leader http://www.rafaeldohms.com.br http://www.phpsp.org.br