Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60615 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 47750 invoked from network); 20 May 2012 21:03:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 May 2012 21:03:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=listas@rafaeldohms.com.br; spf=fail; sender-id=fail Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=listas@rafaeldohms.com.br; sender-id=fail Received-SPF: fail (pb1.pair.com: domain rafaeldohms.com.br does not designate 209.85.217.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: listas@rafaeldohms.com.br X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.217.170 mail-lb0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.217.170] ([209.85.217.170:36746] helo=mail-lb0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 86/A8-15660-F1C59BF4 for ; Sun, 20 May 2012 17:03:28 -0400 Received: by lbgc1 with SMTP id c1so3288733lbg.29 for ; Sun, 20 May 2012 14:03:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=mMciPR+CBVd1sJSYgLj7JLzW7qpbtjCf5nZfUSLB0sQ=; b=R+BB8xdYIhrxmkmjfsKn5RLZ0YuQfCC9AnQBO4GZKTu2Aox4GGh1JNUkw46Ak29Doh KRHbiUIVWZGb3+xH/0MJ0M/hlZMh8BxOhpxXorj+b1ngJEe8d9T3vbh2KHZVa32N0Dep 5EM48Mb0+Ko0ZK1nfbkrSDwORIBpmaBvyZmhlYgGpJQI2QQytRoWr7pBtaEJBC9D0Gny GanqtJSqxYzTjHlfvqFAvB02rrr6Buw0WF4FcUiRe5ru8BRSP0Gpl/qbxY4OUXMbD82T v2cfw7JV0yvILEWeo+OtmUX0SWC2jxR2fZJXP9npGRLw/kPz1mxt9WbV5CUo9cqwrE5W lmdg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.132.40 with SMTP id or8mr6809707lab.24.1337547804699; Sun, 20 May 2012 14:03:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.145.194 with HTTP; Sun, 20 May 2012 14:03:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4FB0AE18.1060902@sugarcrm.com> Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 23:03:24 +0200 Message-ID: To: Anthony Ferrara Cc: Pierre Joye , Stas Malyshev , Nikita Popov , "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnoyaXuzgopPEaLtZY+EzRtioTv55ZzOHqO7xvwrHZ3rcdS50xQz/1JTrBr+nTRg15KQGKC Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE] Vote change for empty() RFC From: listas@rafaeldohms.com.br (Rafael Dohms) On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Anthony Ferrara wrote: > I had meant to reply to the list, but I had replied to Stas directly. > I would be happy to change my vote from isset() and empty() to empty() > only if that's what it would take... > > Anthony This would settle it, so in the realm of "action" what can we do now? Is there a rule that allows to call for a re-vote? Should start a new RFC? Or can we just alter the vote and consider this the "end of voting"? Sorry, but all this talking is running around in circles, and everything has been said. I would like to bring closure to this topic. -- Rafael Dohms PHP Evangelist and Community Leader http://www.rafaeldohms.com.br http://www.phpsp.org.br