Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60550
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.161.170 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKOpQSwmQjX1TR=XEGtZVBivghE8XA8vGL7uM3xh6v9ta6j7xA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF+90c-Xfs0n-E=+s3g9GE=UZHGvPYdagCho0ma65u6YB+0Tgg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAF+90c-_78TufE8+L8UNfuXLwPW9QgrSWyQaHvS8TOjj40-_cQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FB01781.60001@sugarcrm.com>
	<CAKOpQSwmQjX1TR=XEGtZVBivghE8XA8vGL7uM3xh6v9ta6j7xA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 23:57:16 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU73iuJMHxjiW4OEpyFRM3FUdFqS1ZdPAKPZSAgX+LQeNw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kris Craig <kris.craig@gmail.com>
Cc: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>, Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@googlemail.com>, 
	PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE] Vote change for empty() RFC
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

hi,

On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Kris Craig <kris.craig@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is exactly what I was afraid of. =A0The current voting process doesn=
't
> account for multi-question votes like this

It does. But one has to select multiple choices votes too, if he does
not want to fail because some voted for one option while they would
have chosen two.

Also as I can understand the frustration for such tight votes, it is
however a good sign that there is no real consensus nor a huge
interest to change that.

The previous votes taken as an example is not comparable. We decided
to take the one we already use in the documentation, if I remember
correctly.

Cheers,
--=20
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org