Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60547 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 71939 invoked from network); 13 May 2012 20:20:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 May 2012 20:20:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.155 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.155 smtp155.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.155] ([67.192.241.155:51428] helo=smtp155.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 99/D5-16338-48710BF4 for ; Sun, 13 May 2012 16:20:21 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp32.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 560DB501E2; Sun, 13 May 2012 16:20:18 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp32.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id F1482501E1; Sun, 13 May 2012 16:20:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FB01781.60001@sugarcrm.com> Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 13:20:17 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nikita Popov CC: PHP internals References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE] Vote change for empty() RFC From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > I just closed the vote for this RFC. The result (see > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/empty_isset_exprs#vote) is: > > * Both empty() and isset(): 3 > * Only empty(): 13 > * None: 4 Low turnout is kind of disappointing - either people are not interested in this feature or don't care in general. Since we have only 3 people voting "both", we should ask them what they prefer. I, for example, prefer "only empty" to "none". -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227