Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60540
Return-Path: <nikita.ppv@googlemail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 38701 invoked from network); 13 May 2012 12:56:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 13 May 2012 12:56:28 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=nikita.ppv@googlemail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=nikita.ppv@googlemail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain googlemail.com designates 209.85.215.42 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: nikita.ppv@googlemail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.42 mail-lpp01m010-f42.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.215.42] ([209.85.215.42:34462] helo=mail-lpp01m010-f42.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id EA/E1-16338-A7FAFAF4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sun, 13 May 2012 08:56:27 -0400
Received: by lagy4 with SMTP id y4so3090055lag.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sun, 13 May 2012 05:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=t+jBLlXV+25IrM08ve9+Te3kkwEEfYgHv6ZdD0HbACk=;
        b=x0atCPmvCy2/ffyc+4sDfCAGbRxXtkau8Aeh3XyPXi4dJOX/mod/oSiXBJSB0iX+uv
         OeFbhPyJQo2vZ05y5V271AWKCJRJ7bvyF4yylF2NlU0GP05vra65C6AtkIdOtntKV9S/
         WMicxLp4BYoWXaO5MKHI5CTgieblGzgY3Tehes7UsdVg/rdBjTsBvMLI7sna6G2+JLEF
         plXPn3l1sJTesa1BcZakvIKtXGznWB28SW/385sO9qHOo6VwxKQFAWSwDiUfUKx9V8oS
         2WJWvC5D8ocYtRrQmmOzECBtCXIJNAg0JEbxu+Dq8S5oODNCd6HuqJwMk0JEtbt6mMpT
         nAmw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.54.100 with SMTP id i4mr2044323lbp.97.1336913783418; Sun,
 13 May 2012 05:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.152.1.196 with HTTP; Sun, 13 May 2012 05:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAF+90c-Xfs0n-E=+s3g9GE=UZHGvPYdagCho0ma65u6YB+0Tgg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF+90c-Xfs0n-E=+s3g9GE=UZHGvPYdagCho0ma65u6YB+0Tgg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 14:56:23 +0200
Message-ID: <CAF+90c-_78TufE8+L8UNfuXLwPW9QgrSWyQaHvS8TOjj40-_cQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Vote change for empty() RFC
From: nikita.ppv@googlemail.com (Nikita Popov)

I just closed the vote for this RFC. The result (see
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/empty_isset_exprs#vote) is:

* Both empty() and isset(): 3
* Only empty(): 13
* None:  4

I'm not exactly sure what the policy for votes with three options is,
but given that the large majority voted for "Only empty()", I'll
assume that that's the accepted option.

I updated my PR to only allow expressions for empty() and added nicer
error messages for isset(): https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/54

It would be nice if somebody could apply that PR, as I don't have Zend karma :)

Nikita