Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:6052 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 80056 invoked by uid 1010); 3 Dec 2003 09:40:39 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 80020 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2003 09:40:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.dybnet.de) (195.75.116.242) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 3 Dec 2003 09:40:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 12989 invoked by uid 508); 3 Dec 2003 09:41:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vandal) (vandal@213.54.199.207) by www.dybnet.de with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 3 Dec 2003 09:41:32 -0000 To: "'Sebastian Bergmann'" , Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 10:39:10 +0100 Organization: BackendMedia GbR MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Thread-Index: AcO5gSgH8u74c4QSS+uW4KNpPpdnxgAAASIQ Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src / CODING_STANDARDS From: smith@backendmedia.com ("Lukas Smith") Message-ID: > From: admin [mailto:admin] On Behalf Of Sebastian Bergmann > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:36 AM > Derick Rethans wrote: > > -[6] Method names follow the 'studlyCaps' > > This is insane. > > Whether you like it or not, most people who use programming languages > that support the paradigm of object-orientation use studlyCaps (or > whatever you want to call them). > > I think it is not a good idea to separate PHP from the rest of the world > like this. Ok so it seems that the CS was just reverted (apparently Derick actually intended to have reverted the CS much earlier). I guess we have the "its ugly" and "its harder to read" on one side. And the "it's the OO standard", "it is easier to read for OO code" and "it breaks compatibility with PEAR" on the other side. Since Marcus patch there are no technical reasons anymore (since we can now preserve case in error messages etc). However I think everybody on the "suckyCaps" side needs to ask themselves if they don't happen to be against this because they think OO sucks. And if that is the case maybe they shouldn't tell the people that do intent to use the OO API's that they should look like the good ol functional APIs. Regards, Lukas