Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60426
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.170 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAyV7nGi6EvEf_tjFp_chn771+5cn-Lqt6mQSDQn2fD61nsAiw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF+90c_N7fhQG_62pEgw_qm2LTDJf=ie0tN1PQVq4XNpMEYcmQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACwt+Jdn7hS8mszbEhhFtthL7hisG-SaXDahzKb9MhY2ZjOWLA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABBJUpdAmkEzh9uek2McmdOCkVOWNuHo6kUsFYizGXbRVZ20Dw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU4VF7y3AJEYmPND-dGuWMrU2NCsXRTBF2p+czazrR33nQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH-PCH5wtv07jLHE=_HzPAJHb-OivB=FdROcyh7dPJn8Tt1dVw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU7kv9X0K5kExXOg3nQBqLxXzGq5hc5DRq5dVj7cVdJ55w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAyV7nGi6EvEf_tjFp_chn771+5cn-Lqt6mQSDQn2fD61nsAiw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 07:39:09 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU6rtep_N992xsgW9znDC3PU+EsPPSw-=Qh+=RBBAK31bg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anthony Ferrara <ircmaxell@gmail.com>
Cc: Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com>, Laruence <laruence@php.net>, 
	Patrick ALLAERT <patrickallaert@php.net>, Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@googlemail.com>, 
	PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Allow non-variable arguments to empty() and isset()
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

hi Anthony,

On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Anthony Ferrara <ircmaxell@gmail.com> wrote=
:

> I voted for the ability to use an expression for isset() as well,
> since I agree with Ferenc, it's a matter of consistency. =A0Sure, the
> use-case for isset() is definitely weaker than for empty(),

No, it is not about consistency but goals and meaning. An expression
is not set or unset. Anyway, that's not something we can argue about
forever :-).

Cheers,
--=20
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org