Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60377
Return-Path: <nikita.ppv@googlemail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 83496 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2012 13:05:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 30 Apr 2012 13:05:50 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=nikita.ppv@googlemail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=nikita.ppv@googlemail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain googlemail.com designates 209.85.215.42 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: nikita.ppv@googlemail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.42 mail-lpp01m010-f42.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.215.42] ([209.85.215.42:56072] helo=mail-lpp01m010-f42.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 1D/8B-13197-D2E8E9F4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:05:50 -0400
Received: by lahl5 with SMTP id l5so1881140lah.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 06:05:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=+IGMnFiKyVlf5JU8K6KOPtMpO0ETa7BNdlcAeGvQYgY=;
        b=pUYjdyqnvUxUi0Zcecc0yqISLnLRyCtzRRuQ44YjQvh73OXBRKq1HjCEJb5dqtfy52
         JxWxrWg0tWPDTWz1VMAiugqALlNQKGBT47TxlDMZS5fXyqOWk0n47QofK5AttXPSaYPU
         j/Q3aY5uhOWgtB6HC8cBTwLu5yoDDe1vfl79XPqfs6P+Q29dx6iAOCoZmkClp7A1GT6B
         6zw4g1KmQ/xBHyXDGMputmm0y8q1WxEVMk1yczcX9aCI80ELdTTNjUAOHY2ks+H4gzAl
         5y4V3tZ9sx4IFSDZuMs91vt5y93tW5S/G/Nv160XSW9GBe3E4dOf4VCxCrXcR+bAyp8l
         ZMVw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.112.161 with SMTP id ir1mr19894137lab.13.1335791145686;
 Mon, 30 Apr 2012 06:05:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.152.1.196 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 06:05:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACwt+Jdn7hS8mszbEhhFtthL7hisG-SaXDahzKb9MhY2ZjOWLA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF+90c_N7fhQG_62pEgw_qm2LTDJf=ie0tN1PQVq4XNpMEYcmQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACwt+Jdn7hS8mszbEhhFtthL7hisG-SaXDahzKb9MhY2ZjOWLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:05:45 +0200
Message-ID: <CAF+90c8tQqWY+ZJ85LBJWGsM2qOpEU1Fr-K4DSMpo5Lg+b-jXQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Patrick ALLAERT <patrickallaert@php.net>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Allow non-variable arguments to empty() and isset()
From: nikita.ppv@googlemail.com (Nikita Popov)

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Patrick ALLAERT <patrickallaert@php.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2012/4/12 Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@googlemail.com>:
>> PS: I added isset() too, to address the consistency concerns mentioned on IRC.
>
> I would have voted +1 if it didn't contain the isset() change. None of
> the examples used in the isset_with_expr.phpt test seems logic to me.
>
> Care to explain the consistency concerns here?
>
> Patrick

I changed the vote to have three options: "Both empty() and isset()",
"Only empty()" or "None"

https://wiki.php.net/rfc/empty_isset_exprs#vote

Nikita