Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60372
Return-Path: <patrick.allaert@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 62750 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2012 07:50:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 30 Apr 2012 07:50:48 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=patrick.allaert@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=patrick.allaert@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.42 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: patrick.allaert@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.42 mail-pb0-f42.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.160.42] ([209.85.160.42:40840] helo=mail-pb0-f42.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 8F/E8-13197-7544E9F4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 03:50:47 -0400
Received: by pbbrp12 with SMTP id rp12so1668790pbb.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=zaLs2klhYBKOTxiTHg2Suay6vwdgaktxBsd0BCAwQvc=;
        b=WkhppnRzjwZW0b/8+5C2H28kjGx1wvUntbcTvOUsaDPPs4LBVqrSNQ5mC42h/czOSS
         j4kHTJMVwm+5/AAfdHClFY/gFBjlV50ud7B5SzHgrrNUc685LFiTQSM1QW7Rhzi+sHHc
         BC0tVIiNDes3H7IzupB1glxCVicTFr2HLu3U3ckXKXvXoGRhHIH87npBqWEAxthjIF7l
         rE2FfKDq5UmDf95a2eB5W1wYkRQBID5gfeSoIKDP/jwrBgMt/ojWkKRNGVgKe8Pt88Fm
         JOh7f/2/q16gY4x1dAIvS3h//yWTWVEy8Pwwbgu3qaOO7r7w+5nGPYv0RcAlhi6qxzki
         KVRQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.212.69 with SMTP id ni5mr11999683pbc.39.1335772244780; Mon,
 30 Apr 2012 00:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: patrick.allaert@gmail.com
Received: by 10.68.50.104 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAF+90c_N7fhQG_62pEgw_qm2LTDJf=ie0tN1PQVq4XNpMEYcmQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF+90c_N7fhQG_62pEgw_qm2LTDJf=ie0tN1PQVq4XNpMEYcmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:50:44 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: dDNPe_2pTSSXUX-zST038-T1qHo
Message-ID: <CACwt+Jdn7hS8mszbEhhFtthL7hisG-SaXDahzKb9MhY2ZjOWLA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@googlemail.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Allow non-variable arguments to empty() and isset()
From: patrickallaert@php.net (Patrick ALLAERT)

Hi,

2012/4/12 Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@googlemail.com>:
> PS: I added isset() too, to address the consistency concerns mentioned on IRC.

I would have voted +1 if it didn't contain the isset() change. None of
the examples used in the isset_with_expr.phpt test seems logic to me.

Care to explain the consistency concerns here?

Patrick