Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60291
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.210.45 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKOpQSw_sxFcY+1+7s-ZLeCp3Gf_kagztpaM7JSiG=iaOEWK6A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKOpQSw_sxFcY+1+7s-ZLeCp3Gf_kagztpaM7JSiG=iaOEWK6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:14:58 +0300
Message-ID: <CAL0xaBF1nPEjNPXfUqBMyj7vX-Wu4A4f-fT8gTFV7Y49SUHNrA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kris Craig <kris.craig@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP internals list <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b0721cce5f08e04be72695c
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Pure PHP Scripts (Updated)
From: arvids.godjuks@gmail.com (Arvids Godjuks)

--047d7b0721cce5f08e04be72695c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

As far as I read there is no difference from the previous RFC - it
says essentially the same.

" The <?php tag, contained within one of these files, tells the webserver
to, in essence, =E2=80=9Cswitch to PHP mode=E2=80=9D and start parsing the =
data as PHP code.
When the ?> tag is reached, the webserver =E2=80=9Cswitches back=E2=80=9D a=
nd resumes
parsing it as HTML. If no tags are given, the webserver will parse the file
data as HTML code until a <?php tag is reached. "

I'm I the only one who thinks that this is just plain wrong? I know for a
fact that there is no "PHP mode" on the WEB server level. I think I
understand what it tries to say, but I totally disagree with what is
written and don't want to guess anything.

24 =D0=B0=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8F 2012 =D0=B3. 22:52 =D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=
=BB=D1=8C=D0=B7=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8C Kris Craig <kris.=
craig@gmail.com>=D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB:

> Hi all,
>
> I finally found some time today to update the RFC based on discussions
> here.  Please have a look and let me know if I missed anything or if
> there's anything else that needs clarifying:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/phpp
>
>
> I also want to know if this is sufficient to satisfy some of the concerns
> that have been raised about being able to implement this into existing
> frameworks that use a more "tangled" architecture.
>
> Thanks!  =3D)
>
> --Kris
>

--047d7b0721cce5f08e04be72695c--