Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60240 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 21099 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2012 17:36:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Apr 2012 17:36:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=can5koy@gmail.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php-php-dev@m.gmane.org; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php-php-dev@m.gmane.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.91.229.3 plane.gmane.org Received: from [80.91.229.3] ([80.91.229.3:38410] helo=plane.gmane.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 9C/59-63732-48E919F4 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:36:06 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SLHkT-0007YQ-0f for internals@lists.php.net; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:35:57 +0200 Received: from 46.197.249.211 ([46.197.249.211]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:35:57 +0200 Received: from can5koy by 46.197.249.211 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:35:57 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 20:35:09 +0300 Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 46.197.249.211 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Complete case-sensitivity in PHP From: can5koy@gmail.com ("C.Koy") On 4/20/2012 6:44 PM, Sherif Ramadan wrote: > > Its naming rules are a little bit inconsistent in that regard. I just > don't see a point in making it completely locale aware. The fact that > you can do soefunc() and SOMEFUNC() and still invoke the same function > is a benefit. And I suppose for those using UTF-8 encoded function > names it might be convenient to make them case-sensitive as well. I'm > not going to argue that it's not. I'm just going to say that it > doesn't seem to be a significant problem. > The lowercase of a multi-byte character is not the lowercase of individual bytes comprising it.