Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60226 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 61154 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2012 06:48:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Apr 2012 06:48:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.173 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.173 smtp173.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.173] ([67.192.241.173:57372] helo=smtp173.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id EE/70-57893-9A6019F4 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 02:48:10 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp17.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 8F8E51884C8; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 02:48:07 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp17.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 496671884C5; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 02:48:07 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4F9106A6.6060308@sugarcrm.com> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 23:48:06 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Galen Wright-Watson CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Access by siblings of (abstract) protected methods From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > In summary: should abstract protected constructors be inaccessible by > siblings, as is true of __clone and __destruct? Should __construct, __clone > and __destruct always be accessible in relatives, as is true of other > methods? Depending on the answers, there could be a documentation issue, or > bugs. I've submitted bug #61782 (https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61782) to track the issue with __clone and __destruct. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227