Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60191 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 69244 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2012 13:41:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Apr 2012 13:41:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tyra3l@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tyra3l@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.42 mail-pb0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.160.42] ([209.85.160.42:57375] helo=mail-pb0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CD/6C-03614-E84CE8F4 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:41:34 -0400 Received: by pbcun1 with SMTP id un1so9743742pbc.29 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:41:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=WVNouZMDC6otM+O3JBLcfrwmiRbqsOpcWA2VqU2G8Co=; b=qMstAdzyjnudhzMYQIvrWIr5XXDDXO+sX9d0Q6lRQlnGfrIJHzP5GKZeRtjkZMZ5Vy RcwxM5vYBtUa4CqkcwzBaLqstS5b+Zbz5R9+eTQlepbbP6YdO/UfiGN1jY/A2YQHqjTM G4pRLwWD89gYxuHWCiBnTwjullfGO/jIjA4E7BnZ5oGr63eQJoJBv/ITnCKfYQRnTlRN DvZkhrLiBhGAN0MQqT17UBgnBtcIR4U9V5mMR6jHMpBZIR2uoTpJ/jVCMYHzDmI20cM0 xstQr1ConeyJnBYESccWujDPA85uW5GQ4IVoTNzyJTItYbWFKY3ePm0LVxQZPazs/b8q iyMg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.201.65 with SMTP id jy1mr6682068pbc.5.1334756491723; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:41:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.227.201 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:41:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1334755077.4917.325.camel@guybrush> References: <4F8C7FAC.6060709@sugarcrm.com> <4F8CABF8.9040301@sugarcrm.com> <4F8CB228.2070609@sugarcrm.com> <4F8CB928.9040400@sugarcrm.com> <4F8DE51E.3090202@sugarcrm.com> <4F8DF39A.8080409@sugarcrm.com> <1334755077.4917.325.camel@guybrush> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:41:31 +0200 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Johannes_Schl=C3=BCter?= Cc: Gustavo Lopes , Stas Malyshev , Pierre Joye , PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b15afe18d03b704bdf43696 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs) --047d7b15afe18d03b704bdf43696 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > And I wonder why that should have more precise rules than the ones we > use to hand out accounts. Basically every candidate I imagine could get > a "proper" account easily, if they want. - we have a dedicated page for requesting vcs account - we also have an agreed upon, loosely defined set of requirements for handing out accounts (first send patches and after a few gets accepted, = you should apply for your own account) - it is a public information who can approve accounts (it is well hidden, but public: http://git.php.net/?p=3Dweb/master.git;a=3Dblob;f=3Dmanage/users.php;h= =3D75c5aa6bf9812b653de35c43667ef03387050437;hb=3DHEAD#l478 ^^) - when an account is approved or rejected, a mail is sent to the list, where we can see who approved/denied/deleted the account if we can have the same for the non-vcs voting approval, that would be fine with me. --=20 Ferenc Kov=C3=A1cs @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu --047d7b15afe18d03b704bdf43696--