Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60161 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 5408 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2012 07:03:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Apr 2012 07:03:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.170 mail-gy0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.160.170] ([209.85.160.170:48291] helo=mail-gy0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 8E/10-03614-1476E8F4 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 03:03:30 -0400 Received: by ghbg2 with SMTP id g2so3951380ghb.29 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:03:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=zqsWp3WQGOdT7rkmJAEom1SIWCYUkMQ0xn00FwAlisE=; b=g5gRPzDTUsZyXty1hICUW36PVTVAhBM9Ds9nvbBhZnD/2Vu/37hGmdMHNehyR5+Ogo l9f3j19i/7HJu0HRJkEkA/uskvZLDPRYxFf+3conKtA0MDbjCPqc8gMsQyp2pPktl5N6 bQzKq0EE9tC9xZlxm3T2UNAkriHUETnaEmG/5dwC1CMyCGfpTlPjmv9E05VffIs1KkLx oHRTDnB+TwP6c2HM183+6D2kQpepvAr0xna1bleYBccHtUMSZWJLPPgHMr9BlcNHjiez 32rkx4nyAR0T14f1sJuD3h8q7zSafJLJQfPHScZOMZvGHiGHGhPdgECOkNJ4OFrl57FL 5Cbw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.79.195 with SMTP id i43mr1016049yhe.53.1334732606858; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:03:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.32.16 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:03:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F8E65F9.4010201@sugarcrm.com> References: <4F8C7FAC.6060709@sugarcrm.com> <4F8CABF8.9040301@sugarcrm.com> <4F8CB228.2070609@sugarcrm.com> <4F8CB928.9040400@sugarcrm.com> <4F8DE51E.3090202@sugarcrm.com> <4F8DF39A.8080409@sugarcrm.com> <4F8E65F9.4010201@sugarcrm.com> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:03:26 +0200 Message-ID: To: Stas Malyshev Cc: PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) hi Stas, On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > >> The goal is to have community leader participating in our design >> discussions and decisions. It has happened already for a couple of >> RFCs (accepted and rejected) and went very well. The FUDs about core >> devs, legacy developers and the like loosing control about the >> direction PHP takes has been killed, it did not happen and it is very >> unlikely that it will happen. > > Excellent. So we have people participating, contributing to RFCs, > getting features accepted, etc. So what's the problem that needs fixing? Nothing right now, everything works as it should so far. We may do a review in a year, or half a year. But as of now we are on track and everything seems to run well. > I am ignoring the comment about FUDs because I have no idea what it is > about, so I guess you are answering somebody other's comment that I have > not read. It was not for you directly but the voting opponent (the very few we have) who cannot get over it. However you are right, they can be ignored (for their opinion about voting :). Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org