Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60160 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 2895 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2012 06:58:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Apr 2012 06:58:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.153 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.153 smtp153.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.153] ([67.192.241.153:41522] helo=smtp153.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D8/E6-21594-DF56E8F4 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 02:58:07 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 7C02E592F1; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 02:58:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp5.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 2BE9C585C7; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 02:58:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4F8E65F9.4010201@sugarcrm.com> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 23:58:01 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Joye CC: PHP Internals References: <4F8C7FAC.6060709@sugarcrm.com> <4F8CABF8.9040301@sugarcrm.com> <4F8CB228.2070609@sugarcrm.com> <4F8CB928.9040400@sugarcrm.com> <4F8DE51E.3090202@sugarcrm.com> <4F8DF39A.8080409@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > The goal is to have community leader participating in our design > discussions and decisions. It has happened already for a couple of > RFCs (accepted and rejected) and went very well. The FUDs about core > devs, legacy developers and the like loosing control about the > direction PHP takes has been killed, it did not happen and it is very > unlikely that it will happen. Excellent. So we have people participating, contributing to RFCs, getting features accepted, etc. So what's the problem that needs fixing? I am ignoring the comment about FUDs because I have no idea what it is about, so I guess you are answering somebody other's comment that I have not read. > the RFC as well. We do not need over killed process as an attempt to > make php more closed to our communities. I'm sorry I didn't understand the last sentence. Could you please explain what you meant by that? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227