Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:6016 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 29368 invoked by uid 1010); 2 Dec 2003 19:01:44 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 29344 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2003 19:01:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jdi.jdimedia.nl) (212.204.192.51) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 2 Dec 2003 19:01:43 -0000 Received: from [10.21.1.187] (c38047.upc-c.chello.nl [212.187.38.47]) by jdi.jdimedia.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hB2J1Vn9015777; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 20:01:42 +0100 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 20:01:30 +0100 (CET) X-X-Sender: derick@localhost To: George Schlossnagle cc: PHP Internals In-Reply-To: <81B01745-24F4-11D8-A17A-000393B2B3C0@omniti.com> Message-ID: References: <34245E0A-24F1-11D8-A17A-000393B2B3C0@omniti.com> <81B01745-24F4-11D8-A17A-000393B2B3C0@omniti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] reflection api -> camelcaps From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, George Schlossnagle wrote: > > On Dec 2, 2003, at 1:18 PM, Derick Rethans wrote: > > > On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, George Schlossnagle wrote: > > > >> I'd like to convert the reflection API to the current php standard of > >> CamelCaps (instead of underscores) for it's class and method names. > >> Any objections? > > > > yes > > Care to elaborate? Sure, i'll repeat what I said on IRC: 19:47 <@Derick> 1. it's not any standard 19:47 <@Derick> 2. it's ugly as hell 19:47 <@Derick> (it was 'standard' for a while but due to popluair demand we removed it from coding_standards) 19:57 <[GeorgeS]> Derick: didn't see the change to CODING_STANDARDS. But that's a good reason. Please have a look at the archives for this, as I remember having a discussion about this too. IMO all internal functions use the underscore way, so why deviate for methods? (This is as far as I go, no need to discuss this again) Derick