Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60151 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 87205 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2012 05:37:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Apr 2012 05:37:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.161.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.170 mail-gx0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.161.170] ([209.85.161.170:52895] helo=mail-gx0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 7F/B3-21594-0035E8F4 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 01:37:04 -0400 Received: by ggmb2 with SMTP id b2so3946087ggm.29 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 22:37:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UoZs8uZu14P8bk0W3jI4Tp1qnaYtPEqfGvvdmVOuPdw=; b=fjkJpZDGWdEygL389ju18ZTA5qK4+2hsWoMt9dxzg2eFBKFE1JS31w/pctKtR2BXSZ MnmY69eHeGgOYLhS4B7QvdrE9TjAHIBpm7QN2wcjpPwEnV65qWchxj8diKbL2fNz8GV8 UEUoOTfhoIGpq76ulo/PhqEOVX5rwrLX22FIU2wCFUTsDnKLFArdyvke20J6OFnNHplW crVdn1fxa11WCHpUhzskxwm/faGZL+0TjW2kT+IyghWeTy/9BlNMs/5/gr1wwOuFL1Om HC3bmbAzmzihvE3p/+mW5QY+h+EeD3DSUcgIrhkD/EAKDMQ13Wb+6K6HXcgN0vrpcmvL zAxw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.170.71 with SMTP id o47mr754858yhl.104.1334727422115; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 22:37:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.32.16 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 22:37:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4F8C7FAC.6060709@sugarcrm.com> <4F8CABF8.9040301@sugarcrm.com> <4F8CB228.2070609@sugarcrm.com> <4F8CB928.9040400@sugarcrm.com> <4F8DE51E.3090202@sugarcrm.com> <4F8DF39A.8080409@sugarcrm.com> <4F8DF80A.2000809@oracle.com> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:37:02 +0200 Message-ID: To: Philip Olson Cc: Christopher Jones , internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) hi, On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Philip Olson wrote: > =A01. Those with SVN [sic] access (but how does karma come into play?) It does, or we begin to have 2nd, 3rd and totally irrelevant classes of developers or doc writers. > =A02. Those without (how do we provide such rights? to whom?) See my other reply, easy, simple, harmless. > I suspect most people voted "Yes" for that RFC thinking it'd mean less no= ise > on this list while not caring about the details. That's only a guess. But > trouble is, defining the "Who" is the most difficult part and a big reaso= n why > general consensus is preferred. I prefer not to comment on that part. It is like saying that people are not able to take a qualified decision, for whatever reasons. I have been myself tempted to think or say the same about some of the php.net members, and have been proven wrong many times. So let ignore this comment. Cheers, --=20 Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org