Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60125 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 30814 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2012 22:50:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Apr 2012 22:50:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.143 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.143 smtp143.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.143] ([67.192.241.143:40560] helo=smtp143.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E7/19-21594-E93FD8F4 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:50:06 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp14.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 26D6A29A618; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:50:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp14.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id D419F29A908; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:50:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4F8DF39A.8080409@sugarcrm.com> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:50:02 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ferenc Kovacs CC: PHP Internals References: <4F8C7FAC.6060709@sugarcrm.com> <4F8CABF8.9040301@sugarcrm.com> <4F8CB228.2070609@sugarcrm.com> <4F8CB928.9040400@sugarcrm.com> <4F8DE51E.3090202@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > sorry, I can't really follow you with that. > do you have a problem allowing the non-vcs users (defined by the voting > rfc) to vote, or do you have a problem providing a clear way for them to > get their voting karma? I have a problem that we don't have understanding of what is the goal of this whole vote setup. What is it for? What we will be doing with it? And please don't say "it says so in RFC" - it is not a goal. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227