Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60114 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 14796 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2012 21:48:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Apr 2012 21:48:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.183 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.183 smtp183.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.183] ([67.192.241.183:40119] helo=smtp183.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id BD/95-21594-125ED8F4 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:48:18 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp8.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 6CEFD81BE; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:48:15 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp8.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 15D3E80DE; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:48:15 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4F8DE51E.3090202@sugarcrm.com> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:48:14 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ferenc Kovacs CC: PHP Internals References: <4F8C7FAC.6060709@sugarcrm.com> <4F8CABF8.9040301@sugarcrm.com> <4F8CB228.2070609@sugarcrm.com> <4F8CB928.9040400@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg51948.html > Pierre said that it was a bug(better to say lack of restriction), that > everybody with wiki account was able to vote, so I changed the voting > plugin to only allow the specific groups(vcs + voting) to be able to vote. This is the authenticated vote. It has also option of having non-authenticated vote. > My point is that we are talking about some formal processes but I don't > see what would be the desired purpose of such processes. For release > process, it's releasing a stable code in time. For RFC, it is informing > people about proposed feature and getting it discussed and hopefully > accepted. Here, I'm not sure what is the goal. > > > To be able to get voting karma if you meet the requirements. without the > need to bribe Hannes, Philip or any other wiki admin. I don't see how getting you "voting carma", whatever it might be, can be a goal of PHP project. I'm talking about the goal of the whole thing. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227