Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60048
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.182 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAH-PCH4nTyzLgeD7i-Am-wdnv3=WnU-BEm9+sVKKNaNhuhNG+Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH-PCH582iFmKavWxAi=TTY1vaEkf6kg4kjkrCu=2rR5wRuZMQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F8C7FAC.6060709@sugarcrm.com>
	<CAH-PCH60zZUg8ugE8gqwfSyHqS9q=q5q-CDkuqd4+B51oKMTtA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F8CABF8.9040301@sugarcrm.com>
	<CAH-PCH51C_ZTEgVo2PGrAea08mUQef93LjqBL97V9TffG_F2rQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F8CB228.2070609@sugarcrm.com>
	<CAKOpQSzXO6Rz9XSwA8jtP4fqHETd5VHUB6iD-8u9oY9ZuwQMTw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH-PCH5J0VqgVsMXuzMY9yVtsDEh2D6ZhGArA6rzEkF6-SLdgQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKOpQSy4Z4XZCAOb6hfzsSNQ9BqidxSiND9YsKi3qOzfWctpyw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH-PCH4nTyzLgeD7i-Am-wdnv3=WnU-BEm9+sVKKNaNhuhNG+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:31:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKOpQSz-a_t9iUAiW5hzS11xeeCn3=AB58=S-3+PgdmuhRA9Og@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com>
Cc: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>, PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dee8211dcc0b04bdd5e62f
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts
From: kris.craig@gmail.com (Kris Craig)

--0016e6dee8211dcc0b04bdd5e62f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:14 AM, Kris Craig <kris.craig@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>> Just to play devil's advocate (Satan and I go way back), what about
>>>> people who are established PHP developers but who generally don't
>>>> participate in the development/discussion of PHP core?  An argument co=
uld
>>>> be made that, as the users of PHP, they should be able to have some sa=
y in
>>>> its development.  That's not my position, mind you; I'm just throwing =
that
>>>> premise out there to see if it holds up.  =3D)
>>>>
>>>
>>> could you please open a separate thread for that?
>>> btw. "regular participant of internals discussions" is one of the reaso=
n
>>> on which group someone can get voting karma.
>>> so if that is provided, anybody have a chance to get join
>>> the decision making process.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ferenc Kov=E1cs
>>> @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
>>>
>>
>> Why would that be a separate thread?  Isn't that what we're talking
>> about?  I.e. determining who gets voting access and who doesn't?
>
>
> I just ask for clarification on how the community representatives (which
> is defined in the accepted voting RFC) can get their karma.
> You are talking about changing the requirements for somebody to be able t=
o
> participate in the voting, thus changing/extending the original RFC.
>

It's the same topic, and the question of who *should* or should not be
allowed to vote was already raised previously on this thread.  That's what
I was responding to.  So, deep breath....  =3D)

--Kris


> --
> Ferenc Kov=E1cs
> @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
>

--0016e6dee8211dcc0b04bdd5e62f--