Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60043
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.210.45 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4F8CB928.9040400@sugarcrm.com>
References: <CAH-PCH582iFmKavWxAi=TTY1vaEkf6kg4kjkrCu=2rR5wRuZMQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F8C7FAC.6060709@sugarcrm.com>
	<CAH-PCH60zZUg8ugE8gqwfSyHqS9q=q5q-CDkuqd4+B51oKMTtA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F8CABF8.9040301@sugarcrm.com>
	<CAH-PCH51C_ZTEgVo2PGrAea08mUQef93LjqBL97V9TffG_F2rQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F8CB228.2070609@sugarcrm.com>
	<CAH-PCH7MUnFNMdM9XOUxB3OKYjSdK8KiBYFMvOCuw0g8dWNDiQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F8CB928.9040400@sugarcrm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 03:05:03 +0200
Message-ID: <CAH-PCH7aF=hD8uU3XVSy9-nbgabFq3hMUA_pnDyAQExjQ63eGQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b2e08975db9c104bdd587fe
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts
From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs)

--047d7b2e08975db9c104bdd587fe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>wrot=
e:

> Hi!
>
> > I'm not sure about it. AFAIK when I implemented my patch to restrict th=
e
> > voting to the vcs users + the voting wiki group, we lost that ability.
> > (see http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg51932.htmlf=
or
> > the history of that change)
>
> I don't see any indication there that community vote is not possible,
> but if it was changed we can make community vote be available again.
>
>
http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg51948.html
Pierre said that it was a bug(better to say lack of restriction), that
everybody with wiki account was able to vote, so I changed the voting
plugin to only allow the specific groups(vcs + voting) to be able to vote.
nobody asked that we would still need to keep the ability to create "open"
votes where anybody can vote, so it wasn't implemented.


> My point is that we are talking about some formal processes but I don't
> see what would be the desired purpose of such processes. For release
> process, it's releasing a stable code in time. For RFC, it is informing
> people about proposed feature and getting it discussed and hopefully
> accepted. Here, I'm not sure what is the goal.
>

To be able to get voting karma if you meet the requirements. without the
need to bribe Hannes, Philip or any other wiki admin.

--=20
Ferenc Kov=C3=A1cs
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu

--047d7b2e08975db9c104bdd587fe--