Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60042 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 99835 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2012 00:28:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Apr 2012 00:28:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.143 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.143 smtp143.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.143] ([67.192.241.143:35356] helo=smtp143.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 01/68-05733-B29BC8F4 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:28:27 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp14.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 0AC97298201; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:28:25 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp14.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id C3E5C298769; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:28:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4F8CB928.9040400@sugarcrm.com> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:28:24 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ferenc Kovacs CC: PHP Internals References: <4F8C7FAC.6060709@sugarcrm.com> <4F8CABF8.9040301@sugarcrm.com> <4F8CB228.2070609@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > I'm not sure about it. AFAIK when I implemented my patch to restrict the > voting to the vcs users + the voting wiki group, we lost that ability. > (see http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg51932.html for > the history of that change) I don't see any indication there that community vote is not possible, but if it was changed we can make community vote be available again. My point is that we are talking about some formal processes but I don't see what would be the desired purpose of such processes. For release process, it's releasing a stable code in time. For RFC, it is informing people about proposed feature and getting it discussed and hopefully accepted. Here, I'm not sure what is the goal. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227