Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60039 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 94921 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2012 23:58:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Apr 2012 23:58:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.143 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.143 smtp143.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.143] ([67.192.241.143:42860] helo=smtp143.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 66/67-05733-B22BC8F4 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 19:58:36 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp14.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 861392981F3; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 19:58:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp14.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 3DB6E2981B5; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 19:58:33 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4F8CB228.2070609@sugarcrm.com> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:58:32 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ferenc Kovacs CC: PHP Internals References: <4F8C7FAC.6060709@sugarcrm.com> <4F8CABF8.9040301@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > no, it only means that our internal processes aren't clear or easily > accessible. > people outside the circle can't do much, than asking people inside to > let them in. If somebody is an outsider to PHP development, why do you think giving him a deciding vote on it would be a good thing? One can discuss things, propose changes, etc. without any special access. > you mean the +1/-1 on the mailing list threads? No, I mean community voting in the wiki. Voting plugin has option to allow anybody to vote. We did such polls in the past. We can do it any day. > but if we decide to keep it, we should make it possible for people to be > able to request for voting karma, and a way to handle those requests. Why sending a message to the list is not enough? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227