Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60038 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 93298 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2012 23:45:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Apr 2012 23:45:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tyra3l@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tyra3l@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.210.45 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.210.45 mail-pz0-f45.google.com Received: from [209.85.210.45] ([209.85.210.45:45687] helo=mail-pz0-f45.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D3/17-05733-F1FAC8F4 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 19:45:36 -0400 Received: by dacx6 with SMTP id x6so7464026dac.18 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:45:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=dUErYe89JgSdhLOx/iTCGQyMar2dPP+GOy+9aJsstcI=; b=aVNI6FGi+c4VX73NB4o55EBWbPjTzcvXcf/3CN+why8LDvDD/xlQfn9AeXdh4kc7Ly gCd2tlDx/DzFFYg1pWq54cmxzS/1h/qarLC6QMPvi66FjOhEidznAm9gr86LKsvnMaAU LsQk1kHnwGkah9wKKELH6dTbaM9dtah6vXZVjgAP4Un72xD4AKRu0/1pT2yjKoeAb3md 3i82lCQ1oqY3hImJzdjTnvJz4W3uFkjN8/eHDSD6t5T8E3bfZDEgNX2r6T6GsKwFYg3E x4lASd4LuI7Cx9sAXEmGS70scwZMQV2IFs9EhPGGKBS3b2KtPLqUkByAuY3DvcE/xnTV l3uQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.241.193 with SMTP id wk1mr4289822pbc.131.1334619931910; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:45:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.189.34 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:45:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F8CABF8.9040301@sugarcrm.com> References: <4F8C7FAC.6060709@sugarcrm.com> <4F8CABF8.9040301@sugarcrm.com> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 01:45:31 +0200 Message-ID: To: Stas Malyshev Cc: PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b339e75f3a1f804bdd46a04 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] voting without vcs accounts From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs) --047d7b339e75f3a1f804bdd46a04 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Stas Malyshev wrot= e: > Hi! > > > the voting RFC explicitly states that it is possible for (some) non-vcs > > users to vote, but there isn't any formal process on how can someone > > apply for voting karma, and what is the decision making process on this= . > > And what is the problem in not having the formal process? > uhm. do I really have to explain it? for you? the same reason why we have the rfc process, the release process, the voting process. I'm not talking about 100% complete, unchangeable rules, but some kind of process to follow. mentioning the option for non-vcs users to vote in the voting RFC without providing them a way to apply for karma is the same as we wouldn't mention it at all. I could also accept if we don't allow them, but then we should be clear about it. > > > which went unanswered and I was also questioned on irc/twitter multiple > > times about how can somebody request voting karma. > > I'd say if you have to request it and you have to ask about it on > twitter, you probably do not know enough about PHP development process > to have a deciding vote on PHP features. no, it only means that our internal processes aren't clear or easily accessible. people outside the circle can't do much, than asking people inside to let them in. > For non-deciding votes, we have > community voting where pretty much anyone can vote. > you mean the +1/-1 on the mailing list threads? that's nice, but I'm talking about the voting laid out in the voting process rfc https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting (what you also supported). as I mentioned before, I can live with it if we remove the ability for non-vcs users to vote, but in that case we should update the rfc (and the karma check in the wiki) accordingly. but if we decide to keep it, we should make it possible for people to be able to request for voting karma, and a way to handle those requests. --=20 Ferenc Kov=C3=A1cs @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu --047d7b339e75f3a1f804bdd46a04--