Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:60024 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 65192 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2012 22:01:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Apr 2012 22:01:12 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tom@punkave.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tom@punkave.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain punkave.com designates 209.85.213.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tom@punkave.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.170 mail-yx0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.170] ([209.85.213.170:41204] helo=mail-yx0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id DF/11-05733-5A69C8F4 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:01:11 -0400 Received: by yenl5 with SMTP id l5so3146271yen.29 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:01:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=qFnI//4FXXSeUBiY/lpsmFtmVZxfRcD8rDA2FiOzfZ8=; b=jslatPruLdvSq0R/TPUNv4qhL4mLGFxBFp9FnxIY1ZNCXfwUMt3mzLUMqNOfoVcnUd TA6AkPEM1X4ATIwL2Y/C7B1vxEbqIiBm9OK+dfB3fHQE3g8eAd7So+1Ut0kiNEFfXBuk EEIGnZZhu/JcoFgo+/6EEBnmZLb3tXXo73uVlEg6iVhkkrXTj84Ur6/R7RLLOwqBh0Zq eSJ4xSANu5E9nST+vK6oG1JkshAnxff5ddhLjlVgVPAP6d5j3XL3pcwPJAC8/6fnXu9L 8kawAv2Q3fSAi2Kci7VaE5QWvrwQ8/RWDxp4rmYRhalf//1C77sSr7zeJNiaBq18DYz8 mICQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.193.101 with SMTP id j65mr12724404yhn.47.1334613666644; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:01:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.57.14 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:01:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4F8C577D.4010303@developersdesk.com> <4F8C757C.1020400@developersdesk.com> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:01:06 -0400 Message-ID: To: PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn/c6a6S2d99M9WlDZRXvlssjbsmkgVE8KbX2a8nJjJ0CuIK5SOf3bc8XeAbM3QFg+4FB+n Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Go for votes for the open tag-less PHP files From: tom@punkave.com (Tom Boutell) Such a vote would make sense if it were clearly expressed that the final RFC would also be subject to a binding vote, so there is no risk of being forced to accept an implementation whose particular details are unacceptable to you. On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Arpad Ray wrote: > Please excuse me for butting in without immediate context. I'd just like to > support the idea of a vote on this concept without getting into specifics. > > If the vote is positive then we can argue the various merits of the > competing RFCs knowing that we at least agree in general. On the other hand > if the vote is negative, we can save a significant amount of time and > effort, and can concentrate on more plausible subjects. > > Cheers, > > Arpad -- Tom Boutell P'unk Avenue 215 755 1330 punkave.com window.punkave.com