Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:59995 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 75070 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2012 10:00:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Apr 2012 10:00:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.42 mail-yw0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.42] ([209.85.213.42:51838] helo=mail-yw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 4B/91-05733-BCDEB8F4 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 06:00:44 -0400 Received: by yhfq11 with SMTP id q11so2601956yhf.29 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 03:00:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=X8CLLjZH2XZNQvjZ/G91TJXg35WPhVG8BH3b/GdlHZI=; b=AWjiIzw7z5b5HRRza+V1UNQkCzZ6WK4JAXaTk/QqfPMkmnvnWKp2hLbSnksLt+O5Kk e8KgYBB+bCDvBo+7rT0qAmss0eVyXMh18EnMYoAl+jAWZNU7swyPZ5j/Y8GmqHg6Q50b lsS8ZqA2cHPe6QMrBbTNqzRFNzqTfEwiukcBxMhHIUzUIsruraA2uCavfHI/ZWMN5t7r fBSxSeK/+Ls7huKQD0A9V7ozNFkTRUDKNLtgpoZ5f7UCCW00vwvxTPkZN5uu/0RCUbtZ 5EDb4AE4Eyu7v/wdFUBe3ZyDXxIYVlF8IjVIJxfMhb/mP7AHKIXPypK+vbgJL+ev7wKL 4pCw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.193.1 with SMTP id j1mr10691504yhn.40.1334570441308; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 03:00:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.168.16 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 03:00:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:00:41 +0200 Message-ID: To: Tom Boutell Cc: PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Go for votes for the open tag-less PHP files From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) hi Tom, On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Tom Boutell wrote: > I don't think a consensus on the following points is likely to emerge > without voting on them individually. I propose carrying out a vote > with up to three questions to be answered depending on your response > to each. We could then proceed to discuss the (relatively boring but > essential) details of keywords and extensions, if any, and create a > final RFC. > > Hopefully all parties can agree to be bound by the results of a vote > on these three questions and work together to create a final RFC that > abides by the result or let the matter drop. > > Let's briefly discuss whether these questions truly represent the > major differences between the three RFCs (not the merits of those > positions please) and then, I hope, carry out a vote on them so we can > move on. Agreed on your proposed next steps. It would rock if you could lead this effort and come up with a RFC covering the various points. I would suggest to sit down together with the other RFCs' authors and get that done. But please, no more discussions here about that. Makes no sense :) Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org