Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:59888
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain punkave.com designates 209.85.213.42 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <03.6A.35770.215388F4@pb1.pair.com>
References: <CAGa2bXZ6G=Cphjrde3u1Mq3AAw-4yJk3s28vNe+Aybt2nGTumg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGa2bXb=RbjPaL=SeUv6vDv_Cvc0O5f_noNdZwue3gFcgnajAA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKOpQSzN4xkJLL_JwbXx1iOJs6Hnxnjh+D2qUjpShqgW8N2S6g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGa2bXaG_SR-F2eKUu3=Quzm6scOhOGB5d4gwZAmCBZTwB=q=w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGa2bXbyhUGMSZsiP6hSap4fi0pVA8sKVeps4ScPb9QQWidkTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F862AAC.90003@lerdorf.com>
	<4F86761A.9010801@lsces.co.uk>
	<CAGa2bXZRuYWBeWRNkF5rbL1Drtt8uP2VeL4mCoXdxw8iswwEVQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAL0xaBFkzgLqnyTpJXqWbvnYNHakV+K5L173tO-a==HiGSXUtw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F876E36.1020400@gmail.com>
	<CAGa2bXZsaae=xYPDSMc0yV_O6G3=tKjV5pV=RuxiMrWra=Oy1Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F87799D.4060601@sugarcrm.com>
	<CAGa2bXbeGjFPaw1=H7anSerAVCOkgY=8iuHcATGB93tuTz_Y9Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGa2bXacWzafy84_yK=QAmspiZd6Yo+KNKWpywjgLxvqpo32zg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4274B530-5FB8-4292-9262-37044CF98B8B@punkave.com>
	<4F87B1D6.2070008@sugarcrm.com>
	<4F87B81F.9000603@gmail.com>
	<03.6A.35770.215388F4@pb1.pair.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:28:32 -0400
Message-ID: <CAORXhG+LF7tqRaSZHJyrFNiezg1pnkeRKqeDSvRLM0cbn9=fUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Disabling PHP tags by php.ini and CLI options
From: tom@punkave.com (Tom Boutell)

Wouldn't this be a significant performance hit when multiplied by
every class file in a project?

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney
<weierophinney@php.net> wrote:
> On 2012-04-13, David Muir <davidkmuir@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 13/04/12 14:55, Stas Malyshev wrote:
>> > > If this is a pecl module library developers cannot use it and trust
>> > > that on php 5.n, it just works. That would fork the language in an
>> > > undesirable way. It should be a core feature, no ini flag, no
>> > > sometimes-there module.
>> > PHP 5.n is at least a year away, wide adoption of it - more like 5 yea=
rs
>> > away. So if you want to write code that would run anywhere (as opposed
>> > on systems you control) you'd have to wait minimum 5 years. Wouldn't i=
t
>> > better to have it earlier?
>> > OTOH, requiring extensions is a common thing for applications, and any
>> > pecl extension is one command away for most setups, or one download aw=
ay
>> > for others. And can be made work even in 5.2 if desired.
>>
>> Can't it also be handled using streams to inject a leading <?php to the
>> file prior to inclusion? A PECL extension would then just make it run a
>> bit faster.
>
> I made this very suggestion earlier this week (we do this in ZF1 to
> emulate short tag support for those who use them).
>
> --
> Matthew Weier O'Phinney
> Project Lead =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0| matthew@zend.com
> Zend Framework =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0| http://framework.zend.com/
> PGP key: http://framework.zend.com/zf-matthew-pgp-key.asc
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>



--=20
Tom Boutell
P'unk Avenue
215 755 1330
punkave.com
window.punkave.com